Transformation of the Principle of the Freedom of the High Seas in the Context of Shipping Decarbonization
海運脱炭素化の文脈における公海自由の原則の変容 (AI 翻訳)
Valentyn Vyshnevskyi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、IMOのEEDI、EEXI、CIIおよびEU ETSが公海自由の原則に与える影響を分析。著者は「環境条件付き航行自由」モデルを提案し、環境義務を公海自由の内在的要素と位置づける。国際規制と地域規制の対立を理論的に整理し、脱炭素化の法的正当性評価枠組みを提示。
English
This paper examines the impact of IMO regulatory mechanisms (EEDI, EEXI, CII) and the EU ETS on the freedom of the high seas. It proposes an 'environmentally conditioned freedom of navigation' model, arguing that environmental duties are inherent to navigation freedom. It provides a doctrinal framework to assess the legitimacy of global and regional decarbonization measures.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は主要海運国であり、IMO規制およびEU ETSへの対応が不可欠。本論文は、日本の海運業界や政策立案者に、公海自由の原則が脱炭素化によりどう変容するかの法的基盤を提供し、SSBJや有報における海運関連開示の理解にも寄与する。
In the global GX context
This paper addresses the global tension between IMO-led multilateralism and regional initiatives like the EU ETS, offering a legal theory to reconcile environmental and navigational interests. It is relevant for ISSB/TCFD-aligned disclosure on shipping emissions and transition finance frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical model for analyzing the legal evolution of navigation rights under climate regulation.
🏢実務担当者:Offers legal grounding for shipping compliance strategies with IMO standards and EU ETS.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the legitimacy criteria for regional vs. global decarbonization measures in maritime law.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Background / Problem. The article examines the transformation of the principle of the freedom of the high seas under the influence of global shipping decarbonization processes. The freedom of the high seas, codified in Articles 87 and 90 of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), constitutes a fundamental pillar of the international maritime legal order. However, the global climate crisis and the imperative to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have prompted a fundamental transformation of the legal regulation of international shipping, which, according to the Fourth IMO GHG Study (2020), accounts for approximately 2.89% of global CO₂ emissions.Objective / Purpose. The study provides a comprehensive doctrinal analysis of the impact of IMO regulatory mechanisms — the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI), the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI), and the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) — as well as the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) on the content and scope of the principle of the freedom of navigation. It is established that IMO technical standards (EEDI, EEXI) represent a legitimate development of the legal regime of the high seas, implemented through the mechanism of flag state jurisdiction under Article 94 of UNCLOS, whereas the CII introduces a qualitatively new type of indirect restriction on the freedom of navigation through operational rating mechanisms. The inclusion of maritime transport in the EU ETS from January 1, 2024, pursuant to Directive (EU) 2023/959, creates a precedent for the extraterritorial application of regional legislation that challenges the principle of exclusive flag state jurisdiction under Article 92 of UNCLOS.Findings / Results. The article identifies a systemic conflict between the paradigms of exclusive multilateralism and regulatory competition in the governance of the global commons. The author proposes a theoretical model of ‘environmentally conditioned freedom of navigation’, which conceptualizes environmental obligations as an inherent element of the freedom of the high seas rather than an external limitation. This model is grounded in three key propositions: environmental obligations constitute an immanent component of the freedom of the high seas; the content of environmental duties is dynamic and evolves with scientific knowledge; and the legitimacy of environmental restrictions is determined by a procedural criterion of establishment through a competent international organization.Conclusion / Significance. The model provides a doctrinal framework for assessing the legitimacy of both universal (IMO) and regional (EU ETS) decarbonization measures and for the further development of the IMO regulatory framework, including the introduction of a global market-based mechanism for emissions reduction.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2026.17.50-58first seen 2026-07-13 07:52:29
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。