Decarbonization in Antarctic tourism: integrating the global sectoral and regional regimes
南極観光における脱炭素化：グローバルなセクター別・地域別レジームの統合 (AI 翻訳)
Jing Jin, Miaomiao Yin
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、南極観光の脱炭素化を阻む規制の分断を、国際海事機関（IMO）などのグローバルなセクター別レジームと南極条約体制（ATS）の地域レジームを比較して分析。両者の適用ギャップや管轄ギャップを特定し、統合的ガバナンスの必要性を論じる。政策立案者に対し、南極環境保護とグローバルな運輸脱炭素化目標を整合させる戦略の緊急性を訴える。
English
This paper examines the regulatory divide in decarbonizing Antarctic tourism by comparing global sectoral regimes (IMO, ICAO, etc.) and the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS). It identifies applicability and jurisdictional gaps between the layers and argues for integrated governance. The study underscores the urgent need for policymakers to align Antarctic environmental governance with global transport decarbonization targets.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は南極条約の締約国であり、南極観光への関与も増加傾向にある。本論文は、国際運輸部門と南極地域の規制を橋渡しする政策的枠組みの必要性を示しており、日本の南極政策や観光業界の脱炭素戦略に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper highlights a critical gap in global climate governance: the disconnect between sectoral transport regulations and regional Antarctic protection. It offers a framework for integrating these layers, relevant to ISSB's emphasis on cross-sector coherence and the upcoming IMO/IAATO decarbonization dialogues.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured analysis of regulatory gaps between global and regional climate governance regimes, useful for scholars of international environmental law and policy integration.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for tourism operators (IAATO members) on navigating overlapping regulations and preparing for stricter decarbonization mandates.
🏛政策担当者:Calls for coordinated strategies between Antarctic Treaty parties and IMO/ICAO, directly relevant to policymakers involved in ATS meetings and transport decarbonization negotiations.
📄 Abstract（原文）
With Antarctic tourism gaining increasing popularity in the twenty-first century, decarbonization in Antarctic tourism shows a growing importance. The challenge of decarbonizing Antarctic tourism lies in governing emissions generated primarily in global aviation and shipping sectors, while relying on the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) for regional environmental governance. This article focuses on this regulatory divide by comparing two governance layers: the global sectoral regimes for aviation and shipping, and the ATS as the regional regime. By conducting a doctrinal analysis and qualitative assessment, it examines the scope of legal obligations and implementation of both governance layers. It identifies hurdles behind the overlaps of regulations by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and self-regulation by International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO), and critical gaps within the ATS itself. It also argues that the global sectoral regimes display an applicability gap in governing Antarctic tourism and the ATS exhibits a jurisdictional gap. Therefore, effective governance on decarbonization of Antarctic tourism requires an integrated governance that explicitly tackles with the hurdles and bridges the gaps, fostering institutional interaction between the sectoral and Antarctic regimes and institutional development within the ATS. This underscores the urgent need for policymakers to develop coordinated strategies that align Antarctic environmental governance with global transport decarbonization ambitions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2026.1737611first seen 2026-06-29 06:12:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。