Smart Buildings in the Energy Transition: A Bibliometric Review of Flexibility, Market Integration, and Policy Barriers
エネルギー転換期のスマートビル：柔軟性、市場統合、政策障壁に関する計量書誌学的レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Tomasz Rokicki, Piotr Bórawski, Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska, Bogdan Klepacki
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、エネルギー転換の文脈におけるスマートビル研究の進化を、柔軟性、市場統合、政策障壁に焦点を当てて計量書誌学的手法と質的統合によりレビューした。結果、研究がコンポーネントレベルの効率からシステムレベルの柔軟性資産としての分析へ移行したが、実証検証や規制実装は未成熟であることを示した。持続的な導入ギャップを説明する枠組みを提供する。
English
This paper reviews the evolution of smart building research in the context of the energy transition, focusing on flexibility, grid interaction, market integration, and policy barriers. Using bibliometric mapping and qualitative synthesis of 663 articles, it finds a shift from component-level efficiency to system-level analysis of smart buildings as flexible demand-side assets. However, empirical validation, interoperability, and regulatory implementation remain underdeveloped, highlighting a persistent implementation gap.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではZEHやVPP（仮想発電所）の推進が進む中、本レビューの示す柔軟性評価や市場統合の障壁は国内政策立案に示唆を与える。特に、規制実装の未成熟という指摘は、日本のスマートビル普及策を再考する契機となる。
In the global GX context
This review contributes to the global discourse on demand-side flexibility and smart grid integration by synthesizing technological, economic, behavioral, and regulatory evidence. It identifies persistent barriers that are relevant for the EU's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and similar policies worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured framework of the implementation gap in smart building deployment, highlighting under-researched areas like occupant behavior and business models.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into market integration challenges and policy barriers that building owners and utilities must navigate for smart building projects.
🏛政策担当者:Identifies regulatory gaps and the need for consistent market mechanisms to enable smart buildings as active grid resources.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The aim of this article is to identify how research on smart buildings has evolved in the context of the energy transition, with particular emphasis on energy flexibility, grid interaction, market integration, and policy barriers. The study addresses a gap in previous reviews, which have often focused on individual technological domains, building automation, or smart-readiness assessment, while paying less attention to the conditions under which smart buildings become active energy-system resources. A systematic review protocol based on the PRISMA logic was combined with bibliometric mapping and qualitative synthesis. Bibliographic data were retrieved from Scopus on 28 February 2026 and covered 663 English-language journal articles published between 2015 and February 2026. A core set of 63 studies was selected through explicit cluster-based and relevance-based criteria for in-depth qualitative synthesis. The results show a gradual shift from component-level efficiency research towards system-level studies in which smart buildings are analyzed as flexible demand-side assets, distributed energy nodes, and participants in emerging market mechanisms. At the same time, the evidence base remains uneven: many studies rely on simulation or case-specific modeling, while empirical validation, interoperability, occupant behavior, business models, and regulatory implementation remain less mature. The article contributes by distinguishing observed bibliometric patterns from conceptual interpretation and by integrating technological, economic, behavioral, and regulatory evidence into a framework explaining the persistent implementation gap in smart building deployment.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/en19132956first seen 2026-07-14 04:39:13
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。