CO2 transport systems for carbon capture and storage: advances, barriers, and future directions
二酸化炭素回収・貯留（CCUS）のためのCO2輸送システム：進展、障壁、将来の方向性 (AI 翻訳)
Ramnarong Wanison, Ar Man, Wahyu Nurkholis Hadi Syahputra, Pradit Terdtoon, Niti Kammuang-lue, Phrut Sakulchangsatjatai
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、CCUSにおけるCO2輸送（パイプライン、船舶、鉄道、トラック）の技術性能、経済性、インフラ要件を分析。パイプラインは大規模連続輸送に最適で、船舶は長距離・洋上に柔軟性を提供。鉄道・トラックは小規模・初期展開に適する。地域別分析では北米と欧州が進んでおり、世界全体ではコスト、規制、インフラの課題が残る。今後の大規模CCUS展開には統合輸送網と政策支援が必要。
English
This review analyzes CO2 transport modes (pipelines, shipping, rail, truck) for CCUS, focusing on technical performance, economic feasibility, and infrastructure. Pipelines are most cost-effective for large-scale continuous transport; shipping offers flexibility for long-distance/offshore; rail and truck suit small-scale or early-stage deployment. Regional analysis shows North America and Europe ahead, while other regions lag. Key challenges remain: high costs, infrastructure gaps, and regulatory uncertainties. Integrated networks and stronger policy support are needed for large-scale CCUS deployment.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はCCUSを国家戦略に位置づけ、2030年までのCCS事業開始を目指す。本レビューは輸送モードの選択肢と国際動向を整理しており、日本のインフラ整備計画（パイプライン・船舶拠点）や規制設計に示唆を与える。特に、日本が直面する地理的制約（離島・沿岸）への対応として船舶輸送の知見が有用。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global CCUS infrastructure debate by systematically comparing CO2 transport modes across regions. It highlights the need for integrated transport networks and policy harmonization, relevant for international initiatives like the IEA's CCUS roadmap and the OECD's cross-border CO2 transport frameworks. The bibliometric findings also reveal research leadership by the UK, offering benchmarking for other nations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of CO2 transport technologies and regional disparities, useful for identifying research gaps and cross-modal optimization.
🏢実務担当者:Offers decision-support for selecting transport modes based on scale, distance, and maturity, aiding project developers in infrastructure planning.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights regulatory and infrastructure barriers across regions, informing policies to enable CO2 transport networks and international cooperation.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) has emerged as a key technology for reducing carbon emissions in industrial sectors. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of CO 2 transport within CCUS, focusing on pipelines, shipping, rail, and truck systems in terms of technical performance, economic feasibility, and infrastructure requirements. Bibliometric analysis indicates that the United Kingdom leads in CCUS transport-related publications, reflecting strong research activity and policy support. The results indicate that pipelines remain the most cost-effective solution for large-scale and continuous transport, while shipping offers flexibility for long-distance and offshore applications. Rail and truck transport are more suitable for small-scale or early-stage deployment due to their operational flexibility. A comparative regional analysis shows that North America and Europe have more advanced transport infrastructure, whereas other regions are still in the early stages of development. Despite significant progress, major challenges remain, including high capital costs, infrastructure limitations, and regulatory uncertainties. Future development requires integrated transport networks, technological innovation, and stronger policy support. This review provides insights into optimizing CO 2 transport systems to support large-scale CCUS deployment and global decarbonization efforts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101991first seen 2026-05-25 04:53:27 · last seen 2026-05-27 04:51:05
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。