gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Just Transition in Hubei’s Automotive Industry: Pathways and Lessons

湖北省自動車産業における公正な移行:経路と教訓 (AI 翻訳)

Lei Hu, Xiping Liu, Ci TAN

Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-30#EV・輸送Origin: CN対象セクター: automotive
DOI: 10.1142/s2345748126500120
原典: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345748126500120

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、湖北省の自動車産業クラスターを事例に、内燃機関車の縮小と新エネルギー車の急拡大が同時進行する中での公正な移行(Just Transition)の論理を分析。制度誘導、市場賦権、社会包摂、地域連携の4次元経路を提示し、スキル再訓練ハブなどの仕組みが雇用圧力を産業高度化に転換することを示した。2024年の湖北省NEV生産109%増が「開発志向の公正な移行」の有効性を実証している。

English

Using Hubei's 'Wuhan-Xiangyang-Shiyan-Suizhou' auto cluster as a case study, this paper analyzes the logic of just transition under simultaneous ICE contraction and NEV expansion. It identifies a four-dimensional pathway involving institutional guidance, market empowerment, social inclusion, and regional synergy, with mechanisms like skill retraining hubs converting employment pressures into upgrading incentives. A 109% NEV production surge in 2024 validates the 'development-oriented just transition' approach, offering a replicable model for Global South nations.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の自動車産業もEVシフトと雇用調整に直面しており、本論文の再訓練ハブや産学連携スキル訓練のメカニズムは、日本の地域雇用政策や産業政策に参考になり得る。特に、SSBJ対応やScope3排出削減の文脈でも、公正な移行の社会的側面は重要である。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global just transition scholarship by providing empirical evidence from China's automotive industry, a sector central to TCFD and ISSB disclosure. Its 'development-oriented just transition' framework and practical mechanisms (e.g., retraining hubs) are relevant for policymakers and firms in Global South countries navigating decarbonization while ensuring social equity.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Offers a structured framework for analyzing just transition in automotive clusters, with empirical validation from Hubei's rapid NEV uptake.

🏢実務担当者:Provides concrete mechanisms like enterprise-education collaboration for retraining, useful for corporate sustainability teams planning workforce transition.

🏛政策担当者:Presents a four-dimensional policy pathway that balances industrial upgrading with social protection, applicable to just transition planning in emerging economies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Faced with the rigid constraints of the “Dual Carbon” goals and the intensifying global technological competition, the transformation of Hubei’s automotive industry is no longer merely technological improvements but even more of a social experiment concerning the livelihood of millions and regional economic restructuring. Based on the case study of Hubei’s “Wuhan–Xiangyang–Shiyan–Suizhou” industrial cluster, this paper analyzes the logic of Just Transition of the automotive industry as it experiences capacity contraction of the traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and explosive growth of new energy vehicles (NEVs) at the same time. The study finds that, leveraging the advantages of a new national system, Hubei province has built a four-dimensional just transition pathway that consists of “Institutional Guidance, Market Empowerment, Social Inclusion, and Regional Synergy”. Through forward-looking mechanisms such as “Skill Retraining Hubs” and “Skills Training On Demand” collaboration between enterprises and educational institutions, Hubei has successfully transformed employment pressure into incentives for industrial upgrading, achieving a paradigm leap from “meeting basic needs of laid-off workers” to “creating high-quality jobs”. Data show that in 2024, Hubei’s NEV production surged by 109%, confirming the practical efficacy of the “Development-Oriented Just Transition”. This paper aims to provide empirical support for national industrial transition policies and offer a replicable “Hubei Solution” for Global South nations trying to balance green growth with social justice.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。