Making intellectual property rights work for climate technology transfer and innovation in developing countries
知的財産権を気候技術の移転と途上国でのイノベーションに活用する方法 (AI 翻訳)
S Lee, Kerstin Hotte, Caoimhe Ring, Robert Burrell
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、知的財産権（IPR）が途上国における気候技術移転・適応的革新・内発的革新に与える影響を、バングラデシュ、インド、ケニア、南アフリカの事例研究に基づき分析。IPRの重要性は従来の議論ほど高くなく、むしろ国家の能力と発展段階が決定的であると結論づける。また、低水準のIPRが気候変動適応技術の促進に寄与する可能性を示し、貿易・気候政策と連携した枠組みを提案する。
English
This paper analyzes the impact of intellectual property rights (IPRs) on climate technology transfer, adaptive innovation, and indigenous innovation in developing countries, using case studies from Bangladesh, India, Kenya, and South Africa. It finds that IPRs' importance is overstated; national capabilities and development levels are more decisive. Lower-tier IPRs may incentivize climate adaptation innovation. A framework integrating IPRs with trade and climate policy is proposed.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本稿は、日本が技術供与国として途上国への気候技術移転を促進する際、IPRよりも現地の能力構築が重要であることを示唆する。日本の二国間クレジット制度（JCM）などの政策に応用可能な視点を提供。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global debates on IPR and climate technology transfer under the Paris Agreement, emphasizing that national capabilities matter more than IPR regimes. It offers a nuanced framework for balancing IPR protection with technology diffusion, relevant for UNFCCC and WTO discussions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systematic framework linking IPR to climate technology innovation and transfer, highlighting the role of national capabilities.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence-based guidance for designing IPR and trade policies that facilitate climate technology transfer to developing countries.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The role of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in climate technology transfer and innovation in developing countries remains controversial, often cast as a barrier to development. Using a systematic literature review and case study methodology, we assess the impact of IPRs on three sources of climate technology: (1) international technology transfer, (2) adaptive innovation, and (3) indigenous innovation. We examine four cases across regions with different development levels: Bangladesh, India, Kenya, and South Africa. Our contributions are threefold. First, existing debates overstate IPRs’ importance, whereas national capabilities and development levels are more decisive. Second, lower-tier IPRs may nevertheless incentivize climate innovation in developing countries. Third, we develop a framework for IPRs to support climate change mitigation and adaptation, considering the broader context of trade and climate policy. IPRs and market mechanisms may encourage the transfer of mitigation technologies under certain conditions, while adaptation requires more institutional support to meet local needs.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/8feaba88-180e-4675-a3f5-9f30d0d9055dfirst seen 2026-07-10 04:58:30 · last seen 2026-07-10 05:28:25
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。