gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Asymmetric Energy-Price Shock Transmission and Electricity-Sector Carbon Transition in ASEAN: Panel NARDL and MIDAS Evidence

La-ongsri W, Sukchitt N, Marupanthorn P

Research Squareプレプリント2026-06-25#エネルギー転換対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10090959/v1
原典: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10090959/v1

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、国際エネルギー価格ショックがASEANの電力セクターの炭素移行に非対称に影響するかを分析。2000-2025年のパネルデータを用い、低炭素電源比率を移行指標とし、NARDLとMIDAS手法を適用。短期的には燃料費上昇が移行を促進するが、長期的には対称的。国ごとの異質性が大きく、単一モデルでは地域全体を説明できない。

English

This paper examines asymmetric transmission of energy-price shocks to electricity-sector carbon transition in ASEAN using panel NARDL and MIDAS. Results show positive short-run effects of fuel-cost increases but symmetric long-run responses. Country heterogeneity is significant; no single model dominates. Supports cautious monitoring interpretation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

ASEAN特有の分析だが、日本企業のASEAN展開やエネルギー調達戦略に示唆。炭素移行の価格メカニズム理解に貢献。

In the global GX context

Provides empirical evidence on energy price shocks and decarbonization in ASEAN, relevant for global transition finance and carbon pricing discussions. Highlights heterogeneity across developing economies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Useful for understanding asymmetric price effects on energy transition in developing regions; methodological reference for NARDL/MIDAS in energy economics.

🏢実務担当者:Insights for energy procurement and investment decisions in ASEAN electricity markets under fuel price volatility.

🏛政策担当者:Informs design of carbon pricing or subsidy policies in ASEAN; cautions against assuming symmetric price-driven decarbonization.

📄 Abstract(原文)

<title>Abstract</title> <p>This paper examines whether international energy-price shocks transmit asymmetrically to electricity-sector carbon-transition performance in ASEAN. Using an unbalanced country-year panel for ten ASEAN economies over 2000--2025, the analysis measures transition performance by the low-carbon share of electricity generation and constructs real local-currency fuel-cost pressure as the main shock variable. The empirical design combines positive and negative shock decomposition, fixed-effect panel nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) estimation, volatility-threshold conditioning, and country-specific rolling forecast comparisons, including mixed-data sampling (MIDAS) specifications. The results indicate statistically significant error correction and positive short-run transmission from fuel-cost increases. In the long run, however, the estimated response to fuel-cost increases and the absolute response to fuel-cost decreases are nearly identical, and the Wald test does not reject symmetry at the regional average. Threshold estimates suggest that high-volatility years may alter the negative-shock channel, although the interaction effects are imprecisely estimated. Forecast comparisons reveal substantial heterogeneity across countries: asymmetric or mixed-frequency terms improve monitoring accuracy in several economies, but no single specification dominates the region. The findings support a cautious monitoring interpretation. Directional fuel-cost pressure, volatility states, and country-specific electricity-system structure are informative for ASEAN transition assessment, but the annual panel does not justify a causal claim that higher fossil-fuel prices directly accelerate decarbonization.</p>

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。