gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Sustainability assurance – a review and research agenda

サステナビリティ保証 – レビューと研究アジェンダ (AI 翻訳)

Yuxia Wang, Cao Wei, Rui Xue, Jinna Zhang

Journal of Accounting Literature📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-18#開示インフラOrigin: Global経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.1108/jal-03-2026-0141
原典: https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-03-2026-0141

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文はサステナビリティ保証に関する文献を系統的にレビューし、企業の動機、理論枠組み、保証基準、品質要因を統合する。ステークホルダー関与の不足や財務監査との分離の必要性など課題を特定し、信頼性向上のための改善策を提案する。

English

This paper systematically reviews the literature on sustainability assurance, integrating motivations, theories, standards, and quality determinants. It identifies challenges such as limited stakeholder engagement and poor separation from financial audit, proposing improvements for credible assurance.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ基準への対応が進む中、保証の質向上は重要課題。本レビューは保証実務の課題と改善方向を示し、日本の開示制度設計や企業実務に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

As global frameworks like ISSB, CSRD, and SEC climate rules mandate assurance, this review highlights critical quality issues and stakeholder alignment, informing standard-setters and practitioners worldwide.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Identifies under-researched areas in sustainability assurance, especially quality measurement and stakeholder engagement.

🏢実務担当者:Provides evidence on effective assurance practices and the need to integrate assurance with internal controls.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights limitations in current assurance standards and suggests improvements for credibility and comparability.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Purpose This paper systematically reviews the existing litearture on sustainability assurance, integrating insights from firms’ motivations, theoretical frameworks, assurance standards, and influencing factors of sustainability assurance quality. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews and synthesises the literature on sustainability assurance within the accounting and finance domain. It systematically examines prior research to distill the core themes, theoretical foundations, methodological approaches, and key findings of sustainability assurance works. Findings Building on a systematic review of the sustainability assurance literature, this paper advances understanding of the field from multiple dimensions. Specifically, by synthesising and extending prior evidence on value creation, risk mitigation, legitimacy building, and the strengthening of internal control systems, it deepens insights into firms’ motivations for seeking sustainability assurance. Moreover, drawing on the perspectives of corporate social relations and the organisational environment, the study systematically integrates the main theoretical foundations of sustainability assurance and demonstrates how firms’ responses to institutional and stakeholder expectations shape the adoption, design, and implementation of assurance practices. At the same time, it critically identifies the limitations of current sustainability assurance standards—particularly regarding comparability, scope, and implementability—and reveals how these constraints affect assurance effectiveness and practical application. Finally, by incorporating the perspectives of assurance practitioners and sustainability report providers, the paper systematically identifies the key determinants of sustainability assurance quality. Meanwhile, this study highlights limitations in assurance quality measures and emphasises the need for more precise and multidimensional assessment approaches. Originality/value This paper highlights critical issues in sustainability assurance and proposes targeted improvements. Limited stakeholder engagement undermines assurance effectiveness, highlighting the need to better align managerial objectives with external stakeholder expectations. Moreover, ensuring credible sustainability assurance requires a clearer separation between financial audit and sustainability assurance functions, the strengthening of internal information systems, and the allocation of adequate organisational resources.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。