Feasibility, co-benefits and trade-offs of climate mitigation and adaptation strategies in blue food systems
ブルーフードシステムにおける気候緩和・適応戦略の実現可能性、共便益、トレードオフ (AI 翻訳)
Aleah Wong, Malin Jonell, Michelle Tigchelaar, Max Troell, Colette C. C. Wabnitz, Edward H. Allison, Karl Deering, Patrik Henriksson, Kristin M. Kleisner, J. Zachary Koehn, Julia G. Mason, Elizabeth Selig, Marleen Schutter
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ブルーフード（水産物）の気候変動緩和・適応戦略22項目を専門家の反復的プロセスでレビュー。生産の脱炭素化や食事転換は緩和に有効、種・漁具転換は適応に有効だが、証拠は文脈依存的で、技術偏重や持続可能性とのトレードオフが課題。単独の戦略ではなく、ポートフォリオで相乗効果を得る重要性を指摘。
English
This paper reviews 22 strategies for climate mitigation and adaptation in blue food systems through an expert-driven process. Decarbonizing production and dietary shifts show mitigation potential; species and gear shifts show adaptation benefits. Evidence is uneven and context-specific, with trade-offs against sustainability and a bias toward technological innovation. Portfolios of strategies are recommended for complementary benefits.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の水産業は気候変動の影響を受けやすく、養殖の脱炭素化や漁業転換は国産ブルーフードの持続可能性を高める政策課題と直結する。SSBJ/有報での開示義務はないが、水産関連企業のESG評価やTCFD対応に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Blue food systems are gaining attention in global climate policy. This review provides a systematic framework for evaluating mitigation and adaptation strategies, relevant for countries integrating food systems into NDCs and for disclosure frameworks like TCFD that consider supply-chain resilience.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of evidence gaps and trade-offs for researchers studying climate strategies in aquatic food systems.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for context-specific strategy portfolios and equity considerations in designing blue food climate policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Blue food -aquatic organisms fished or farmed in marine and freshwater areas, including fish, shellfish, and aquatic plants -make critical contributions to nutrition, livelihoods, and economies, and can have lower carbon footprints than other animal-source foods. While blue foods are increasingly discussed as part of climate change mitigation and adaptation, climate change also affects the feasibility, performance, and equity outcomes of blue food strategies, and evaluations of such strategies remain limited. Through an expert-driven, iterative process, we review 22 strategies through which blue foods may contribute to climate mitigation or adaptation, consolidating evidence on their potential effectiveness, feasibility, and associated trade-offs and synergies across sustainable development outcomes. The reviewed literature provides relatively good evidence for the mitigation potential of Decarbonizing production practices and Dietary shifts, and for adaptation benefits associated with Species and gear shifts. However, evidence across strategies remains uneven, highly context-specific, and in some cases limited. Trade-offs with sustainable development outcomes, risks of maladaptation, and a persistent bias in research and policy towards technological innovation over systemic and societal change complicate evaluation and implementation of blue food climate strategies. No single strategy emerges as transformative in isolation. Rather, findings suggest that contextappropriate portfolios of strategies, implemented in combination, may offer complementary and synergistic benefits. Further research and evaluation are needed to substantiate claims about the transformative potential of blue foods, including systems-based analyses and targeted assessments of individual strategies, with particular attention paid to capacity-strengthening measures and equity in design and implementation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1088/2976-601x/ae7a77first seen 2026-06-29 04:55:49 · last seen 2026-06-29 04:56:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。