Energy Justice in the EU Renewable Hydrogen Economy
EU再生可能水素経済におけるエネルギー正義 (AI 翻訳)
Alba Forns-Gómez
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本書は、EUの水素エネルギー移行における認識的および手続き的正義に焦点を当て、脆弱なステークホルダーの参加と公平な便益分配を分析する。特に、アーフス条約の一般的枠組みと水素特有の参加枠組みを比較し、後者がより包摂的なアプローチを採用していることを指摘する。
English
This book chapter examines recognitional and procedural justice in the EU's hydrogen transition, analyzing how public participation frameworks involve vulnerable groups. It finds that while the Aarhus Convention provides a one-size-fits-all approach, the hydrogen-specific framework adopts more inclusive measures.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも水素戦略が進む中、本稿はエネルギー正義の視点から、政策決定における包摂性と公平性の重要性を示す。SSBJや有報では直接扱われないが、企業のステークホルダーエンゲージメントに示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This work adds a justice lens to global hydrogen policy discussions, offering insights for regions developing hydrogen strategies to ensure equitable stakeholder participation beyond technical aspects.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Highlights the need to integrate energy justice into hydrogen policy research, particularly regarding procedural and recognitional dimensions.
🏢実務担当者:Hydrogen project developers should consider inclusive stakeholder engagement to align with EU values and mitigate social risks.
🏛政策担当者:EU's shift toward inclusiveness in hydrogen participation frameworks offers lessons for other jurisdictions designing just transition policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Unequal societies lead to unequal outcomes in the distribution of opportunities and decision-making power, creating a sociological divide between the privileged and the underprivileged. In times of socio-technical transformations such as that of the EU&s;s hydrogen energy transition inequalities may reproduce. The energy justice discourse looks after resolving the inequalities arising within energy transitions through a circular process where questions such as who is at stake in the transition, how to involve them in shaping the transition, and how the costs and benefits should be equitably distributed become central in the transition dialogues. While EU policy poses significant efforts towards transitioning to hydrogen technologies, its legal framework should, on the basis of the EU values of equality and democracy, safeguard that an EU hydrogen economy is a project that takes everyone into account to decide how this transition should look. This book chapter focuses on the recognitional and procedural justice of the hydrogen transition by analysing the extent to which the EU&s;s lex generalis and specialis for public participation involve the vulnerable in hydrogen decisions through equity-based approaches. The book chapter finds that while the general framework set under the Aarhus Convention sets an egalitarian “one-size-fits-all” approach, the special framework for hydrogen public participation begins to adopt more inclusiveness-oriented approaches.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003669654-11first seen 2026-07-05 04:50:58
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。