Decarbonizing Shipping: Does the EU-ETS Ensure a Just Transition?
海運の脱炭素化：EU排出権取引制度は公正な移行を保証するか？ (AI 翻訳)
Z. Malakouti, M. Hazrati
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、2024年1月からEU排出権取引制度（EU-ETS）が海運セクターに拡大されたことを批判的に検討する。公正な移行の枠組みを用いて、手続き的、分配的、コスモポリタンな不正義を特定し、気候政策における公正性の重要性を強調する。
English
This paper critically evaluates the extension of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) to maritime shipping as of January 2024. Using a 'Just Framework', it identifies procedural, distributive, and cosmopolitan injustices arising from the scheme, arguing that the policy may undermine a just transition despite its climate intentions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本においても、海運は重要な産業であり、GHG排出削減が求められている。しかし、EU-ETSのような地域的な炭素価格制度は、国際海運の競争条件や公正性に影響を与える可能性がある。本論文の公正移行の視点は、日本の気候政策や国際交渉においても示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
Global shipping faces increasing regulatory pressure, with the EU-ETS extension setting a precedent for regional carbon pricing in maritime transport. This paper's justice lens is crucial for policymakers worldwide who are designing carbon pricing mechanisms that aim to avoid exacerbating inequalities between developed and developing countries, and among stakeholders in the shipping value chain.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured justice framework for evaluating carbon pricing policies in maritime transport, useful for scholars in climate policy, environmental justice, and transport governance.
🏢実務担当者:Shipping companies and port authorities should note the identified justice concerns when preparing for EU-ETS compliance and future expansion of carbon pricing to other regions.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should consider the procedural, distributive, and cosmopolitan injustices highlighted here when designing or adapting carbon pricing schemes for maritime to ensure a just transition.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Maritime transport plays a pivotal role in global trade, handling approximately 80 per cent of trade by volume. However, it is also a significant contributor to GHG emissions, accounting for about 3 per cent of global anthropogenic emissions. Despite global climate efforts, the shipping industry has largely remained outside the direct regulatory scope of international climate policies. At the regional level, the European Union (EU) has taken unilateral action by integrating maritime transport into the EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) as of January 2024. This extension covers 50 per cent of emissions from voyages between EU and non-EU countries and 100 per cent of emissions from intra-EU voyages. While this regulatory action aims to mitigate climate impacts, concerns have emerged regarding its justice implications. This article critically evaluates the expansion of the EU-ETS through the lens of the ‘Just Framework’, identifying procedural, distributive, and cosmopolitan (in)justices arising from the scheme.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-bja10073first seen 2026-06-29 06:15:18
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。