gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Energy-Use Rights Trading for Low-Carbon Industrial Process Systems: A Review of Pollution Reduction and Efficiency Gains

低炭素産業プロセスシステムのためのエネルギー使用権取引:汚染削減と効率向上のレビュー (AI 翻訳)

Zhen Zhao, Renjin Sun, Zihao Yu

Processes📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-02#炭素価格Origin: CN対象セクター: manufacturing
DOI: 10.3390/pr14132155
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14132155

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

中国のパイロット経験を中心に、エネルギー使用権取引(EURT)が産業プロセスの低炭素化と効率向上にどのように貢献するかをレビュー。割当量の希少性や価格、監視・報告・検証、流動性、政策協調の重要性を指摘。炭素排出権取引やホワイト証書制度などと比較し、今後の研究課題を提示する。

English

This review examines China's pilot Energy-Use Rights Trading (EURT) and its role in reducing industrial carbon emissions and improving efficiency. It compares EURT with carbon emissions trading, white certificates, and other schemes, highlighting factors like quota scarcity, pricing, monitoring, and policy coordination that determine effectiveness. The paper provides a stylized process-system illustration and outlines future research needs.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

中国のエネルギー使用権取引(EURT)の経験は、日本の産業部門における排出量取引やエネルギー効率化政策の設計に示唆を与える。特に、工場レベルのエネルギー管理と排出量取引の連動、政策調整の重要性は、日本のGX政策(グリーントランスフォーメーション)にも応用可能である。

In the global GX context

The paper offers comparative insights from China's EURT pilot relevant to global carbon pricing and energy efficiency certificate schemes. It highlights key design elements (monitoring, liquidity, policy coordination) critical for the effectiveness of emissions trading systems, useful for policymakers in the EU, US, and Japan.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Emissions trading design researchers will find the comparison of EURT with other schemes and identification of research gaps valuable.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability managers in energy-intensive industries can learn from factors affecting EURT effectiveness, such as quota price and monitoring, which may influence investment decisions.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers designing or refining carbon pricing mechanisms or energy efficiency obligations can draw lessons from China's EURT pilot experience on market design and policy coordination.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Industrial process systems must reduce energy use and carbon emissions while maintaining productivity under binding constraints. Energy-use rights trading (EURT), also referred to as energy-consuming rights trading, energy quota trading, or energy-consumption permit trading, converts administrative energy-consumption control into tradable entitlements. This narrative and integrative review uses a transparent search-and-screening audit and reframes EURT primarily through the Chinese pilot experience, while using international energy-efficiency certificate and obligation schemes as comparative context. The review examines how quota scarcity, quota prices, monitoring, reporting and verification, trading liquidity and policy coordination may influence process-level energy management, production scheduling, heat integration, waste-heat recovery, equipment renewal, fuel substitution, electrification, digital monitoring and low-carbon retrofit decisions. It compares EURT with carbon-emissions trading, pollution-permit trading, white-certificate or energy-efficiency-obligation schemes, water-rights trading and renewable-energy certificates. Evidence suggests that EURT can support pollution reduction, carbon mitigation, and green productivity improvement when quota scarcity is binding, markets are liquid, monitoring is reliable, and policy coordination is credible, but findings remain heterogeneous and vulnerable to contamination from overlapping policies. A stylized process-system illustration shows how quota prices can alter the ranking of retrofit investments. Future research should integrate transaction records, equipment-level energy data, process simulation and multi-policy identification strategies.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。