Potential regenerative agricultural practices for different ecosystems to rebuild soil health and ensure food security: A comprehensive review
異なる生態系における土壌の健康回復と食料安全保障を確保するための潜在的な再生農業手法：包括的レビュー (AI 翻訳)
P. Kannan, Mohamed Roshan Abu Firnass Mustaffa, Vijayakumar Shanmugam, Surya Teja Varanasi, S. Jayaraman
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
120の実証研究から再生農業8手法の効果を評価。熱帯でバイオ炭・有機物施用によりSOCが10-15%増加、温帯では不耕起・輪作でSOC安定化。作物収量は熱帯で10-18%向上、GHG排出は3-5%削減。地域特化型戦略の重要性を強調。
English
This review synthesizes 120 empirical studies on eight regenerative agriculture practices. Biochar and organic amendments increased soil organic carbon by 10-15% in tropical systems, while no-tillage and crop rotations improved carbon stabilization in temperate systems. Crop yields rose 10-18% and GHG emissions decreased 3-5%. The findings highlight the need for region-specific strategies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のみどりの食料システム戦略は有機農業・炭素貯留を推進。本レビューの地域別データは、日本での再生農業導入効果推定に有用だが、日本の事例は含まれず直接的な政策提言には追加検証が必要。
In the global GX context
This review provides a climate-stratified global evidence base for regenerative agriculture's multiple benefits. For global GX, it supports nature-based solutions and carbon farming under Article 6 or voluntary carbon markets, but lacks direct corporate disclosure applicability.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive framework comparing eight RA practices across climate zones, useful for designing further field trials.
🏢実務担当者:Offers evidence-based guidance on selecting RA practices for soil health and yield improvement in tropical and temperate systems.
🏛政策担当者:Supports policy incentives for regenerative agriculture with quantified SOC and GHG mitigation potential, but region-specific data needed.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Regenerative agriculture (RA) offers a holistic approach to restore soil health, enhance crop productivity and mitigate climate change impacts. This review compiles evidence from 120 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2025 to evaluate the effectiveness of eight major RA practices. It includes no‐tillage, organic amendments, biochar application, residue retention, cover cropping, crop rotation, agroforestry and crop–livestock integration across tropical ( n = 73) and temperate ( n = 47) agroecosystems. In tropical systems, 21 studies reported soil organic carbon (SOC) increases of 10–15% following biochar application and organic amendments, while 9 temperate studies documented improved SOC stabilization under no‐tillage and diversified crop rotations. Improvements in soil quality indicators, including aggregation, nutrient availability and microbial activity, ranged from 7 to 13%, supported by 15 tropical and 6 temperate studies. Crop yield enhancement of 10–18% was observed in 24 tropical studies under residue retention and organic amendment practices, whereas 11 temperate studies reported sustained productivity gains under crop rotation and crop–livestock integration. Additionally, 18 studies across both climatic regions documented greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions of 3–5%, particularly in agroforestry and conservation‐based systems. Agroforestry systems offered multiple co‐benefits, particularly in humid and sub‐humid regions because of their higher carbon sequestration potential. Unlike previous reviews that primarily focused on individual regenerative practices or isolated soil carbon responses, this review provides a climate‐stratified comparative synthesis integrating soil health, crop productivity and GHG mitigation across multiple RA practices. These insights emphasize the need for region‐specific RA strategies supported by long‐term research, incentives and policies to achieve sustainable and climate‐resilient food systems.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.70138first seen 2026-07-04 04:37:14
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。