Slow-release urea fertilizer and nitrification inhibitors affect greenhouse gas emissions and population of soil microorganisms in a saturated soil
徐放性尿素肥料と硝化抑制剤が飽和土壌における温室効果ガス排出と土壌微生物群に及ぼす影響 (AI 翻訳)
Oslan Jumadi, Sri Wahyuni, Yasser Abd. Djawad2, Nur Anny Suryaningsih Taufieq3, St. Fatmah Hiola, Jendri Mamangkey, Weiguo Cheng4, Kazuyuki Inubushi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、飽和土壌条件において、ゼオライトベースの徐放性尿素と硝化抑制剤(特にジシアンジアミド)の組み合わせが、亜酸化窒素(N2O)排出を大幅に削減することを示した。そのメカニズムは、アンモニアモノオキシゲナーゼ阻害による硝化抑制であり、微生物群集サイズの変化ではない。一方、ニーム添加の効果は不安定だった。水田など飽和土壌での温室効果ガス削減に実用的な示唆を与えるが、圃場検証が課題。
English
This study shows that combining zeolite-based slow-release urea with the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) significantly reduces N2O emissions under saturated soil conditions. The mechanism involves inhibition of ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), suppressing nitrification and reducing substrate for N2O, rather than changes in microbial population sizes. Neem-based inhibitors showed inconsistent effects. Field-scale validation is needed.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の水田は主要なN2O発生源ではないが、飽和土壌での窒素管理は農業分野のGHG削減に寄与する。本知見は、国内の肥料改良や農業普及に活用可能。
In the global GX context
Globally, N2O from agriculture is a potent GHG. This study provides mechanistic evidence for DCD effectiveness in saturated soils, relevant for rice paddies and other flooded crops, supporting mitigation strategies under IPCC guidelines.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The mechanistic insight that N2O reduction is driven by AMO inhibition rather than microbial population shifts is valuable for soil microbiology and GHG modeling.
🏢実務担当者:Farmers and fertilizer companies can consider zeolite+DCD formulations to reduce N2O emissions from flooded fields, though field validation is needed.
🏛政策担当者:This supports including DCD in national GHG mitigation strategies for agriculture, but cost-benefit analysis and field trials are required.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The application of urea-based fertilizers in water-saturated soils represents a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly nitrous oxide (N2O). This study evaluated the effects of zeolite-based slow-release urea combined with nitrification inhibitors on methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and N2O emissions, as well as nitrogen transformation and soil microbial populations under saturated conditions. A 49-day laboratory incubation experiment was conducted using five treatments: control (no nitrogen), granulated urea (U), urea + zeolite (UZ), urea + zeolite + neem (UZN), and urea + zeolite + dicyandiamide (UZD). Methane emissions declined rapidly after 14 days and remained low across all treatments, indicating dominant methane oxidation under saturated conditions. Zeolite-amended treatments increased CO2 emissions, likely due to enhanced microbial respiration. Notably, the UZD treatment significantly reduced N2O emissions compared to other urea treatments, while maintaining higher ammonium (NH4⁺) and lower nitrate (NO3⁻) concentrations throughout the incubation period. The reduction in N2O emissions was not associated with changes in nitrite-oxidizing bacterial populations but rather with inhibition of ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), thereby suppressing nitrification and reduced substrate availability for N2O emissions. These findings indicate that process-based controls on nitrogen transformation are more critical than microbial population size in regulating N2O emissions. In contrast, neem-based treatments showed less consistent mitigation effects. Overall, the results demonstrate that combining zeolite-based slow-release urea with dicyandiamide is an effective strategy for mitigating N2O emissions under saturated soil conditions. However, field-scale validation is required to confirm these findings under natural agricultural conditions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.25252/se/2026/243238first seen 2026-06-30 05:53:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。