Governing the digital transition: the role of protection and indemnity associations in China’s green and sustainable maritime transformation
デジタル移行のガバナンス:中国のグリーンで持続可能な海運変革におけるP&Iクラブの役割 (AI 翻訳)
Tiexiong Wang, Nan Jiang, S. A. Biancardo, Min Zhang, Shiwen Zhu, Han Zhang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、中国のグリーン海運移行におけるP&Iクラブの役割を分析。デジタルツール(ビッグデータ、AI)がリスク評価を変革する中、中国のP&Iクラブは法的地位不明瞭、国際化遅延などの課題を抱える。国際的なP&Iクラブの成熟したガバナンスと比較し、立法整備、デジタル変革、標準策定への参加を提言する。
English
This paper analyzes the role of Protection and Indemnity Associations (P&I Clubs) in China's green maritime transition. Amid digital tools reshaping risk assessment, Chinese P&I clubs face challenges like unclear legal status and lagging internationalization. Comparing with mature international practices, it proposes strategies including legislation, digital transformation, and participation in standard-setting.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の海運業界も、グリーン化とデジタル化の波に直面している。本論文の中国事例は、日本のP&Iクラブや海事保険のガバナンス改革への示唆となる可能性がある。特に、岸電や代替燃料など新リスクへの対応は日本でも共通課題。
In the global GX context
This paper highlights how digital tools and green transition pressures are reshaping maritime insurance governance globally. It provides a case study of China's institutional gaps, offering lessons for other emerging economies and for international bodies coordinating shipping decarbonization and digitalization standards.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a legal and institutional analysis of P&I clubs in China's green shipping transition, useful for comparative governance studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for maritime insurance and compliance teams on challenges of digital and green transition, especially in China.
🏛政策担当者:Identifies legislative and regulatory gaps in China's maritime governance, relevant for policymakers designing frameworks for green shipping.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Under the backdrop of data-driven maritime era and the shipping industry’s green and low-carbon transition, the China Shipowners’ Mutual Assurance Association is confronted with unclear legal status, insufficient operational capacity and delayed internationalization. Emerging risks including shore power, alternative fuels and emission control have posed systemic challenges to its traditional governance framework, with risk scenarios expanding from navigation to port berthing and liability identification shifting from single party to multi-party coordination. While digital tools like big data and AI are reshaping risk assessment and governance paradigms internationally, this paper adopts methodologies of legal characteristic analysis, comparative study of domestic and international practices, and case studies to clarify the core roles of Protection and Indemnity Associations (P&I Clubs) in areas such as accident investigation, oil pollution claims, and security provision. The findings indicate that international P&I clubs have formed mature governance and risk-sharing mechanisms, while Chinese counterparts are hampered by legislative gaps, traditional risk control models, incomplete global networks and limited international influence. To address these gaps and position the association to leverage future data-centric governance models, this study puts forward a four-pronged strategy based on institutional construction, capacity building and international expansion: formulating special legislation, advancing digital transformation and talent training, and participating in the formulation of technical standards and international rules to boost green port governance collaboration. This will help the association transform from passive adaptation to active leadership, so as to support the high-quality, data-aware, and sustainable development of China’s shipping industry.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2026.1856194/pdffirst seen 2026-07-16 06:35:19
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。