Fossil fuel leadership or fossil-fuelled leadership? The limits of Denmark’s oil and gas production phaseout
化石燃料リーダーシップか、化石燃料に依存したリーダーシップか？デンマークの石油・ガス生産段階的廃止の限界 (AI 翻訳)
Lukas Slothuus
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
デンマークの気候リーダーシップと石油・ガス生産段階的廃止の矛盾を、27のインタビューに基づき分析。同国の先駆的リーダーシップには重大な限界があり、世界的な化石燃料段階的廃止の必要性を示唆。
English
Analyzes Denmark's contradiction between climate leadership and continued oil/gas production using 27 stakeholder interviews. Finds that even an ambitious first-mover falls short, highlighting the need for more credible global fossil fuel phaseout governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
デンマークは気候リーダーを自任するが、実際には石油・ガス生産を継続。日本のエネルギー政策にも、排出削減と化石燃料依存のジレンマに関する教訓を提供する。
In the global GX context
Contributes to global climate governance literature by empirically examining the credibility gap in supply-side climate leadership. Relevant for countries like Norway, Canada, and others claiming leadership while expanding fossil fuel production.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a qualitative case study on the tensions between climate leadership claims and continued fossil fuel extraction.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes that credible phaseout policies must align with production realities; mere announcements are insufficient.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Understanding the limits of existing fossil fuel phaseout policies is key for clarifying the challenges of phasing out fossil fuels. In this article, I focus on Denmark as a prominent example of the tension between ‘fossil fuel leadership’ and ‘fossil-fuelled leadership’ due to the conflict between its self-positioning as a first-moving global climate leader and continued and new oil and gas production despite its phaseout policy. I examine the origins, appeal, and limits of Denmark’s climate and fossil fuel leadership claims and ambitions, using novel data from 27 interviews with key Danish climate and energy stakeholders. I argue that Denmark’s leadership ambitions contain major limitations, because despite its attempt to provide first-mover leadership, Denmark’s fossil fuel policy is insufficient. If even one of the most ambitious supply-side leaders falls short of its responsibility, this shows the need for more credible and extensive fossil fuel phaseouts in the global climate governance architecture to become a serious force for limiting the climate crisis. As climate leadership must be credible to be effective, the Danish case offers important cautionary lessons for policy-makers from other fossil fuel producing countries as well as climate and energy scholars.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-026-09726-zfirst seen 2026-07-09 05:00:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。