The challenges, opportunities and the future of nature-based solutions utilization in Tanzania and Kenya
タンザニアとケニアにおける自然を基盤とした解決策の活用の課題、機会、そして未来 (AI 翻訳)
Hussein Luswaga
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、タンザニアとケニアにおける自然を基盤とした解決策（NbS）の課題、機会、将来性を文献レビューにより比較分析した。両国でNbSは社会課題の緩和に貢献しているが、ケニアの方が政策枠組みへの統合が進んでいる。地域コミュニティの参加と伝統知識（NgitiliやAlalili）の活用が重要であり、NbSの普及には資金増額と政策のリンケージ強化が必要と結論づけている。
English
This study compares the challenges, opportunities, and future of nature-based solutions (NbS) in Tanzania and Kenya through a literature review. NbS have mitigated societal challenges in both countries, with Kenya showing more advanced policy integration. Community engagement and indigenous knowledge (e.g., Ngitili, Alalili) are key. The paper recommends increased funding, awareness, and cross-sectoral policy linkages for NbS mainstreaming.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではNbSはグリーンインフラや森林管理などで注目されるが、本研究はアフリカ固有の文脈に焦点を当てており、直接的な示唆は限定的。ただし、地域コミュニティ参加や伝統知識の活用という視点は、日本の地域再生や適応策にも応用可能。
In the global GX context
The paper contributes to the global NbS literature by providing comparative evidence from East Africa, a region underrepresented in NbS research. It highlights the role of policy integration and community engagement, aligning with global frameworks like the SDGs and the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative analysis of NbS in two East African countries, filling a gap in regional NbS scholarship.
🏢実務担当者:The community engagement models (Ngitili, Alalili) offer practical approaches for implementing NbS in similar contexts.
🏛政策担当者:Recommends integrating NbS into national policies and increasing funding, relevant for developing countries planning NbS strategies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Nature-based solutions have proven effective in addressing a multitude of societal challenges. Despite this potential, most research on NbS is based on developed economies, with few relevant examples of NbS applications in African countries. This situation limits tailoring NbS to local contexts, thereby minimizing their efficacy and limiting knowledge and information sharing about potential NbS to address various societal challenges. Based on an in-depth literature review, this study explores the challenges of NbS utilization, the societal benefits of NbS, implementation limitations, and opportunities for NbS mainstreaming, with special emphasis on Kenya and Tanzania. Specific examples have highlighted sectors in Kenya and Tanzania where NbS interventions have helped to minimize societal challenges and improve livelihoods. Kenya has demonstrated a slight advantage over Tanzania in integrating NbS into policy frameworks. In both countries, community engagement and indigenous knowledge, such as Ngitili and Alalili, have been integral to NbS implementation. The study recommends raising awareness of NbS potential, prioritizing sectoral linkages through streamlined NbS policies, encouraging adaptive and innovative solutions for NbS implementation, and increasing funding for investment and projects focused on NbS utilization. The success of NbS internalization across sectors and livelihood levels can yield wide positive externalities that not only minimize local challenges in Kenya and Tanzania but also contribute to regional and global success, such as achieving sustainable development goals. The study's novelty lies in its comparative analysis of the two East African countries and in the contextualization of the benefits and challenges of implementing the NbS.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2026.2693376first seen 2026-06-29 05:26:00 · last seen 2026-06-29 05:26:09
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。