gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Unearthing facets of sustainability initiatives reporting and legitimacy: a knowledge management perspective

持続可能性イニシアチブ報告と正当性の側面を掘り起こす:知識管理の観点から (AI 翻訳)

Liu, Weiming, Sahore, Nidhi, Gupta, Bhumika, Coppola, Paolo, Della Puca, Antonella

Journal of Knowledge Managementプレプリント2025-12-24#ESG
DOI: 10.1108/jkm-06-2025-0896
原典: https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-06-2025-0896

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

この研究は、インドの観光企業の持続可能性報告書を分析し、環境・社会・ガバナンス(ESG)イニシアチブの開示の程度とばらつきを調査した。BRSRフレームワークに基づく報告書の内容分析と定量分析を用い、これらの開示が正当性の確立と知的資本形成に貢献することを示した。特に環境イニシアチブがグリーン知的資本形成に大きく寄与している。

English

This study analyzes sustainability reports of Indian tourism firms to examine the extent and variance of ESG initiative disclosures. Using the BRSR framework, it finds that disclosures contribute to legitimacy and intellectual capital formation, with environmental initiatives dominating green intellectual capital. The paper maps ESG initiatives to SDGs, showing alignment.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

インドのBRSR報告フレームワークに基づく分析であり、日本のSSBJや有報でのサステナビリティ開示にも示唆を与える。観光セクター固有のESG開示のばらつきと正当性の関係は、日本企業のセクター別開示実務にも参考になる。

In the global GX context

This paper provides evidence from an emerging market on how ESG disclosure variance affects legitimacy, relevant for global standard-setters like ISSB and CSRD. It highlights the role of sector-specific frameworks (BRSR) in driving ESG reporting, offering comparative insights for other jurisdictions.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Researchers studying ESG disclosure variance and legitimacy can use this methodology for other sectors and regions.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can learn how transparency in ESG initiatives builds legitimacy and intellectual capital.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can observe how the BRSR framework drives ESG reporting in India and consider similar approaches for sector-specific disclosure mandates.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the sustainability disclosure framework surrounding India’s tourism firms and to analyze the Environmental Initiatives (EI), Social Initiatives (SI) and Governance Initiatives (GI) of these firms, which constitute their intellectual capital (IC) and establish their legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach This inductive approach–based study investigates the sustainability reports of listed tourism firms. It analyzes the extent and variance of sustainability disclosures concerning environmental (E), social (S) and governance (G) aspects through a combination of qualitative content analysis and quantitative methods. Findings Based on a sample of 30 listed tourism companies that are publishing business responsibility and sustainability reports (BRSR), the results of these reports, based on content and quantitative analysis, indicate the extent and variance of environmental, societal and governance (ESG) initiatives reported by the tourism firms that help legitimize their activities and contribute to intellectual capital formation. Research limitations/implications This study sought to analyze the sustainability reports as per the BRSR 2021 framework, which is so far applicable to the top 1,000 listed companies of India; however, not many tourism firms fall into this category. As a result, the number of firms that published sustainability reports in 2021–2022 is small. Future studies can extend this research in tourism with a more extensive data set for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Moreover, there is no limitation to applying this methodology in other industry sectors with a larger sample size. Practical implications ESG disclosures by these firms contribute to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through their business operations and initiatives’ ESG impact. Policymakers and managers, both at national and global levels, can push ahead the agenda of sustainable tourism through the interaction of firms and stakeholders within the national policy preview, such as BRSR reporting, and international policy purview, such as SDG mapping of ESG initiatives as a part of larger sustainability goals where tourism firms are one of the key contributors to them. Social implications The quality and extent of ESG initiatives and their variance in tourism firms affect how diverse stakeholders gauge and assess the business and social responsibility discharged by the listed entities in this sector. Originality/value Most disclosure-based studies focus on aggregate disclosures; however, this study aims to examine the extent and variance of sustainability disclosures related to environment (E), social (S) and governance (G) in a disaggregated manner within the tourism sector. Such ESG initiative-based disclosures are then mapped to SDGs to find that ESG initiatives are in tandem with the SDG goals. This study found that the listed tourism firms in India are passably reporting on sustainability to establish legitimacy, and the extent of associated initiative disclosures varies significantly within the groups contributing primarily toward green intellectual capital formation due to overarching EI. In addition, the knowledge management–enabled ESG disclosures collectively contribute toward enhancing human, structural and relational capital to legitimize their initiatives.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。