Research Collaboration and Thematic Evolution in Green Accounting Disclosure and Sustainability Reporting: A Bibliometric Analysis
グリーンアカウンティング開示とサステナビリティ報告における研究協力とテーマの進化:計量書誌学的分析 (AI 翻訳)
Lailah Fujianti
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2021~2026年のDimensionsデータベースに基づき、グリーンアカウンティング開示(GAD)とサステナビリティ報告(SR)の研究協力構造とテーマ進化を計量書誌学的に分析した。VOSviewerを用いた共起分析、共著分析、組織・国別協力分析により、情報透明性、企業統治、ESG指標へのテーマシフトが明らかになった。米国が最多論文数、ガーナ大学が最も影響力のある機関であった。
English
This study maps research collaboration and thematic evolution in Green Accounting Disclosure (GAD) and Sustainability Reporting (SR) using bibliometric analysis of Dimensions database publications (2021-2026). Co-occurrence and co-authorship analyses reveal a shift from environmental compliance toward ESG indicators and data-driven frameworks. The US leads in publication count, while the University of Ghana is the most influential institution.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ基準の策定が進行中であり、グリーン会計開示とサステナビリティ報告の研究テーマの進化を俯瞰することは、今後の開示実務や学術研究の方向性を考える上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
This bibliometric overview reflects the global shift from compliance-based reporting to integrated ESG measurement, aligning with ISSB and GRI frameworks. It provides a useful landscape for researchers tracking disclosure evolution.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Identifies dominant themes and collaboration networks in GAD and SR research, guiding future study directions.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the growing emphasis on ESG indicators and data-driven evaluation, which can inform corporate reporting strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Shows regulatory evolution from environmental compliance to advanced sustainability measurement, supporting standard-setting.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This study aims to map the research collaboration structure and thematic evolution of Green Accounting Disclosure (GAD) and Sustainability Reporting (SR) based on publications indexed in the Dimensions database during the 2021–2026 period. A bibliometric approach was employed using data retrieved from the Dimensions database through searches with the keywords “Green Accounting Disclosure” and “Sustainability Reporting.” The analysis was conducted using VOSviewer software and incorporated several bibliometric techniques, including co-occurrence analysis, co-authorship analysis, organizational network analysis, country collaboration analysis, overlay visualization, and density visualization. The findings reveal a substantial increase in publications related to GAD and SR throughout the observation period, with research productivity reaching its peak in 2025. Keyword analysis identified several dominant research themes, including information, board, state, crisis management, and technique, highlighting the growing importance of information transparency, corporate governance, and sustainability management within this research domain. Temporal visualization further demonstrates a thematic shift from an initial emphasis on environmental management and regulatory compliance toward more advanced approaches centered on sustainability measurement, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) indicators, and data-driven evaluation frameworks. Collaboration network analysis indicates that the United States contributed the largest number of publications, while the University of Ghana emerged as the most influential institution within the research network. The results suggest that the development of GAD and SR research has been driven by the combined effects of increasing global scientific collaboration and the transformation of research themes toward more integrated, measurable, and sustainability-oriented perspectives. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the intellectual landscape of GAD and SR research and identifies promising directions for future scholarly investigations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v7i3.6965first seen 2026-07-16 05:43:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。