gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

The Missing Carbon Dimension in ESG Evaluation Systems under Carbon Neutrality Targets: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

カーボンニュートラル目標下におけるESG評価システムの欠落した炭素次元：文献レビューとビブリオメトリック分析 (AI 翻訳)

Yiting Chen

Journal of improved oil and gas recovery technology.📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-21#ESGOrigin: CN
DOI: 10.53469/wjimt.2026.09(05).03
原典: https://doi.org/10.53469/wjimt.2026.09(05).03

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、中国のカーボンニュートラル目標を背景に、ESG評価における炭素関連指標の独立した評価の欠如を指摘。Web of ScienceとCNKIの文献を対象に、ESGとカーボンニュートラルの接点に関する研究動向をビブリオメトリック分析で明らかにし、今後の研究課題として炭素中立型ESGフレームワークの構築を提言。

English

This paper identifies the lack of an independent carbon dimension in ESG evaluation systems under China's carbon neutrality targets. Through a bibliometric analysis of Web of Science and CNKI publications, it maps the research shift from general CSR to climate governance and recommends developing carbon-neutrality-oriented ESG frameworks.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX文脈では、ESG評価における炭素要素の独立評価の必要性を示唆し、SSBJや有報での気候関連開示の充実に参考となる。

In the global GX context

Globally, this paper reinforces the need to integrate carbon neutrality into ESG frameworks, supporting ISSB and TCFD alignment and enhancing carbon disclosure substance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of the ESG-carbon neutrality nexus and identifies research gaps for future empirical work.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for ESG rating systems to incorporate a dedicated carbon dimension to better assess corporate transition readiness.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests that regulators should consider requiring carbon-neutrality-specific disclosures beyond generic E ratings.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Against the backdrop of global climate governance and China’s dual-carbon targets, carbon neutrality has become a systemic agenda linking energy transition, industrial upgrading, and governance transformation. ESG assessment is increasingly connected with carbon governance, disclosure, and low-carbon transition. However, existing ESG rating systems usually place carbon-related indicators under the environmental pillar, lacking an independent carbon-neutrality perspective and thus limiting their ability to capture firms’ heterogeneous carbon-governance capabilities. Based on a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of Web of Science and CNKI publications, this study finds that research at the ESG–carbon neutrality nexus has shifted from general corporate responsibility assessment toward climate governance and low-carbon transition. Current studies mainly focus on ESG governance and corporate transition, carbon disclosure and capital-market responses, and green finance and resource allocation. Future research should develop carbon-neutrality-oriented ESG assessment frameworks, strengthen the identification of substantive emission-reduction performance, and expand empirical evidence through larger samples and policy-evaluation designs.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。