Costly Signals and Cheap Talk: Measuring the Decoupling of ESG Routinisation and Greenwashing Risk
コストのかかるシグナルと安価な口先：ESGルーティン化とグリーンウォッシングリスクの乖離の測定 (AI 翻訳)
Giacomo Zatini, Nicola Torricella, A. D. Porta
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
企業のESGに関する「発言（開示）」と「行動（実績）」の乖離を測る二指標（ESGルーティン化指数・グリーンウォッシングリスク指数）を開発。593社の5年パネルデータを用いた分析から、ルーティン化指数は環境イノベーションと短期利益圧縮に関連し、グリーンウォッシングリスク指数はESG評価と強く連動することを示す。
English
This paper develops a dual-index framework (ESG Routinisation Index and Greenwashing Risk Index) to measure the gap between firms' ESG talk (disclosure) and walk (actual performance). Using a 5-year panel of 593 large-cap firms, it finds that the greenwashing risk index is tightly aligned with ESG ratings, while the routinisation index is associated with environmental innovation and short-term margin compression.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ基準に基づく有価証券報告書でのサステナビリティ開示が義務化されつつあり、グリーンウォッシング規制も強化されている。本論文のTalk–Walk Matrixは、日本企業の開示と実態の乖離を分析する際の実践的な枠組みを提供する。
In the global GX context
With the ISSB standards and global anti-greenwashing regulations gaining traction, this study provides a robust empirical framework to distinguish genuine ESG integration from mere disclosure. The Talk–Walk Matrix is directly applicable to corporate sustainability assessment and regulatory oversight.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel dual-index methodology for empirically measuring greenwashing and ESG routinisation, offering a basis for further studies on disclosure credibility.
🏢実務担当者:The Talk–Walk Matrix can help corporate sustainability teams benchmark their own ESG performance against peers and identify areas where disclosure may not match actual practices.
🏛政策担当者:Illustrates that current ESG ratings may misalign with actual environmental process improvements, suggesting the need for regulatory frameworks that penalise greenwashing while rewarding costly routinisation.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Greenwashing is a systemic challenge to sustainable finance, yet prevailing ESG metrics still tend to equate more disclosure with more sustainability. We develop a dual‐index framework to compare firms' ESG ‘talk’ and ‘walk’ using hard data. An ESG Routinisation Index approximates the costly integration of sustainability into emissions, safety and circularity routines, while a Greenwashing Risk Index measures environmental talk–walk misalignment by comparing environmental‐facing ESG assessments with peer‐relative environmental process improvement. Using a 5‐year panel of 593 large‐cap firms, we find that ERI is weakly related to ESG ratings but is associated with environmental innovation and short‐term margin compression, consistent with routinisation as a costly signal, whereas GRI is tightly aligned with ESG scores and tends to be rewarded by markets. Mapping firms into an ESG Talk–Walk Matrix reveals that ‘storytellers’—low routinisation, high talk–walk gaps—form both the largest group and a common transition destination over time.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71079first seen 2026-07-01 05:46:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。