GLOBAL STANDARDIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION AS THE BASIS OF THE COMPETITIVENESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF AN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY
国際企業の競争力マネジメントシステムの基盤としてのグローバル標準化と国際認証 (AI 翻訳)
Mariia Kovalova
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿では、国際企業の競争力向上におけるグローバル標準化と国際認証の役割を検討する。従来の競争要因に代わり、統一基準への適合と認証が戦略的資産となることを示す。ESG基準と持続可能性の統合が先進市場での正当性の鍵とされ、品質・倫理・技術に基づく競争への移行が提唱される。
English
This article examines the role of global standardization and certification in enhancing competitiveness of international companies. It argues that traditional factors are replaced by integration into global ecosystems through uniform standards. The integration of ESG criteria and sustainability is highlighted as key for market legitimacy. The study concludes that competition based on quality, ethics, and technology is the path to long-term success.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業は海外進出やサプライチェーンにおいて国際規格(ISOなど)への適合が不可欠であり、本稿はその戦略的意義を整理している。特にESG基準の統合は、SSBJや有報での開示対応にも関連する。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a strategic perspective on how international standards and certification, including ESG integration, underpin competitiveness in global markets. It is relevant for companies navigating ISO, ISSB, and sustainability requirements.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a conceptual framework linking standardization, certification, and ESG to corporate competitiveness.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights certification as both a license to operate and a marketing tool, useful for compliance and branding.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the role of standards in shaping competitive dynamics, relevant for trade and industrial policy.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The article examines the transformative role of global standardization and international certification within the strategic management system of modern companies. It is substantiated that under contemporary conditions, traditional competitiveness factors are being superseded by a business's ability to integrate into global ecosystems through uniform standards of quality and trust. Standardization is viewed not merely as a technical regulation but as a strategic asset that enables the scaling of processes, mitigation of operational risks, and assurance of consistent product quality worldwide. Particular attention is paid to the challenges of implementing unified requirements. Critical barriers are identified, including the tension between global unification and local market adaptation, regulatory protectionism of national governments, and the technological divide that limits the capacity of subsidiaries in developing countries. The study emphasizes the rapid obsolescence of official ISO norms due to the swift advancement of artificial intelligence, necessitating the development of proactive corporate standards. The author demonstrates that certification serves as a mechanism for the practical verification of reputational capital. The distinction between mandatory certification as a «license to operate» and voluntary certification as a strategic marketing tool is revealed. Furthermore, the article outlines eight fundamental principles of quality management that form a self-regulating system of continuous improvement ranging from customer focus and evidence-based decision-making to the establishment of mutually beneficial supplier relationships. A significant focus is placed on the integration of ESG criteria and sustainability principles into corporate strategies, which serve as key markers of legitimacy in developed markets. The study concludes that transitioning from price-based rivalry to competition based on quality, ethics, and technological excellence is the primary pathway to long-term success. Consequently, for international companies, alignment with international standards remains a strategic imperative for enhancing global competitiveness.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.32782/2312-7872.1.2026.16first seen 2026-07-16 06:39:34
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。