Toward an interpretive approach to recognition justice in energy transitions
エネルギー移行における承認正義への解釈的アプローチに向けて (AI 翻訳)
Charissa Leiwakabessy, Imrat Verhoeven, John Grin
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、エネルギー正義研究における承認正義の経験的運用の不足を指摘し、解釈的認識分析（IRA）という質的枠組みを提案する。IRAは、個人の経験のマッピング、相互作用の再構築、制度的文脈への接続という3つの分析ステップを通じて、認識の動態を明らかにする。オランダの住宅改修事例を用いてその有用性を示す。
English
This paper addresses the underdeveloped empirical operationalization of recognition justice in energy transitions by introducing Interpretive Recognition Analysis (IRA), a qualitative framework grounded in interpretivist epistemology. IRA proceeds through three analytical moves: mapping individual experiences, reconstructing interaction dynamics, and connecting to institutional context. The framework is illustrated with two vignettes from energy housing renovation in the Netherlands.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のエネルギー移行政策（例：脱炭素化に向けた住宅改修補助）において、地域コミュニティや弱者の認識を考慮した公正な移行の実現に示唆を与える。IRAは、政策立案者が認識の偏りを特定し、より包摂的な施策を設計するための方法論を提供する。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global energy justice scholarship by offering a methodological framework to trace recognition dynamics in energy transitions. It provides a tool for policymakers and practitioners to identify intervention points that address relational and interpretive conditions, relevant to just transition debates worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー正義研究の方法論的発展に寄与する枠組みを提供。
🏢実務担当者:地域密着型のエネルギー移行プロジェクトで、住民の認識を考慮したアプローチに活用可能。
🏛政策担当者:公正な移行政策の設計において、認識正義の視点を組み込むための指針となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Over the past decade, energy justice scholarship has expanded substantially, developing frameworks for assessing equity and fairness across energy systems and transitions. Recognition justice has emerged as a core dimension alongside distributional and procedural justice. Yet its empirical operationalization remains underdeveloped, often examined through evaluative, outcome-oriented approaches that obscure the processual and relational dynamics through which recognition and misrecognition take shape in practice. This article addresses this methodological gap by introducing Interpretive Recognition Analysis (IRA), a qualitative framework grounded in interpretivist epistemology for investigating recognition dynamics empirically. Our contribution is twofold. First, drawing on Butler's notion of recognizability, we conceptualize recognition justice as a processual, relational and interpretive phenomenon, foregrounding the prior interpretive and institutional conditions that shape what and who can be seen and acknowledged within energy transitions. Second, we operationalize this conceptualization through IRA, which proceeds through three analytical moves: (i) mapping individual experiences, (ii) (re)constructing interaction dynamics, and (iii) connecting these to the broader institutional and policy context, with an intersectional sensibility informing all three moves. We illustrate IRA's analytical utility through two vignettes from energy housing renovation in the Netherlands. The article contributes to broader energy justice debates by offering IRA as a methodological framework that enables researchers and practitioners to trace recognition dynamics in situ and to identify intervention points attentive to the interpretive and relational conditions through which injustices are (re)produced and sustained in energy transitions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104871first seen 2026-08-13 04:55:14
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。