Carbon and water footprint of coffee consumed in Finland—life cycle assessment
フィンランドで消費されるコーヒーの炭素および水フットプリント—ライフサイクルアセスメント (AI 翻訳)
Kirsi Usva, Taija Sinkko, Frans Silvenius, Inkeri Riipi, Hannele Heusala
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
フィンランドで消費されるコーヒーのライフサイクル全体(栽培から消費まで)の炭素フットプリントと水不足影響を評価。8つの農園(ブラジル、ニカラグア、コロンビア、ホンジュラス)とフィンランドの焙煎・包装メーカーから一次データを収集。炭素フットプリントは0.27〜0.70 kg CO2 eq/リットルで、栽培段階が32〜78%を占め、肥料使用が最大の要因。水不足影響は非灌漑の中央アメリカで低いが、ブラジルの灌漑農園では大きい。
English
This LCA assesses the carbon and water scarcity footprints of coffee consumed in Finland, covering the entire life cycle from cultivation to consumption. Primary data from eight farms in Brazil, Nicaragua, Colombia, and Honduras, and Finnish roasters and packaging manufacturers. Carbon footprint ranges 0.27-0.70 kg CO2 eq/l, with cultivation contributing 32-78%, mainly from fertilizer use. Water scarcity impact is low for non-irrigated Central American systems but significant for irrigated Brazilian farms.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の食品・飲料企業にとって、輸入農産物のサプライチェーン排出量(Scope 3)算定の参考となる。SSBJ開示やサプライチェーン排出量削減が求められる中、栽培段階のホットスポット特定は重要。
In the global GX context
This study provides detailed hotspot analysis for coffee supply chains, relevant for global Scope 3 accounting and sustainable sourcing. It highlights the importance of cultivation-stage emissions and water use, informing corporate disclosure under ISSB/CSRD and supply chain decarbonization strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides comprehensive LCA data for coffee, highlighting cultivation-stage hotspots and trade-offs between carbon and water impacts.
🏢実務担当者:Useful for coffee companies to identify supply chain hotspots and prioritize mitigation actions in sourcing and production.
🏛政策担当者:Informs agricultural policy on reducing GHG emissions and water use in coffee cultivation, especially in exporting countries.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Abstract Purpose Coffee is one of the most widely grown cash crops globally, but there are few scientific articles on its carbon footprint and water scarcity impacts. The aim of this study was to assess the carbon footprint and water scarcity impacts throughout the life cycle of the coffee chain (cradle-to-grave) and to identify the most important sources of the impacts (hotspots). Methods The system included all the key stages of the supply chain from land use change and coffee cultivation to roasting and household consumption. Primary data was collected from eight coffee cultivation farms in Brazil, Nicaragua, Colombia and Honduras and coffee roastery and packaging manufacturers in Finland. The AWARE method was applied in a water scarcity impact assessment. Results and discussion The carbon footprint varied from 0.27 to 0.70 kg CO 2 eq/l coffee. The share of the coffee cultivation stage varied from 32 to 78% and the consumption stage from 19 to 49%. The use of fertilizers was the most important process contributing to the carbon footprint. Furthermore, deforestation-related emissions notably increased the carbon footprint of coffee from Nicaragua. Compared with the previous literature, our results indicate a relatively larger share of climate impacts in the cultivation stage and less during consumption. The water scarcity impact was relatively low for non-irrigated systems in Central America, 0.02 m 3 eq/l coffee. On Brazilian farms, irrigation is a major contributor to the water scarcity impact, varying from 0.15 to 0.27 m 3 eq/l coffee. Conclusions Improving the management practices in cultivation and fertilization is key for lower GHG emissions. Irrigation optimization is the most important mitigation strategy to reduce water scarcity impact. However, actions to reduce these two impacts should be executed side by side to avoid shifting burdens between the two.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01799-5first seen 2026-08-02 17:28:54 · last seen 2026-08-02 17:29:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。