製造業におけるカーボンニュートラルと経済成長に関するレビュー
A review of carbon neutrality and economic growth in the manufacturing sector (原題)
Mridul Deka
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
製造業は世界のGHG排出の約20%を占め、脱炭素と経済成長の両立が課題である。本レビューは電化・水素製鉄・CCUS・循環型製造などの技術経路と、CapExと長期運用耐性の経済的トレードオフを整理する。EU CBAMの本格稼働など政策枠組みの変化と、Industry 4.0とグリーンサプライチェーンの交差が脱炭素をコンプライアンス負担から競争力ある収益ドライバーへ転換する点を示す。
English
Manufacturing accounts for ~20% of global GHG emissions, facing tension between mid-century carbon neutrality and economic growth. This review synthesizes literature on electrification, hydrogen metallurgy, CCUS, and circular manufacturing, weighing CapEx against long-term operational resilience. It examines policy shifts like the EU CBAM's full activation and argues that Industry 4.0 and green supply chains can turn decarbonization from compliance burden into a competitive revenue driver.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
CBAM本格稼働は日本製造業の輸出競争力に直結し、SSBJ開示やScope 3対応と併せて日本企業の脱炭素投資判断に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Frames industrial decarbonization within CBAM and global carbon pricing, offering a synthesis relevant to ISSB/CSRD disclosure and transition finance debates for hard-to-abate sectors.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured synthesis of technological pathways and economic trade-offs in industrial decarbonization for further empirical work.
🏢実務担当者:Useful for manufacturing firms assessing CapEx trade-offs and CBAM exposure when planning decarbonization and green supply chain strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights how CBAM and carbon pricing interact with industrial competitiveness and green growth policy design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract The global manufacturing sector stands at a critical State; balancing the mandate for carbon neutrality by mid-century against the core imperative of sustained economic growth. Accounting for nearly 20% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, industrial production is historically coupled with fossil fuel consumption. This review synthesizes a few literatures to evaluate the macroeconomic and microeconomic dynamics of industrial decarbonization. It explores core technological pathways—including industrial electrification, hydrogen-based metallurgy, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS), and circular manufacturing frameworks. The study shows the economic trade-offs, evaluating the conflict of capital expenditures (CapEx) and long-term operational resilience. It analyzes shifting global policy frameworks, such as the full activation of the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Finally, it outlines how the intersection of Industry 4.0 and green supply chains transforms decarbonization from a compliance burden into a competitive revenue driver. Keywords: Decarbonization, Carbon Lock-In, Green Growth, Kaya Identity, Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23384509first seen 2026-10-17 04:44:16
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。