南アフリカにおける家庭のエネルギー貧困：次元・要因・格差、および健康・正義・持続可能性への含意
Household Energy Poverty in South Africa: Dimensions, Drivers, Disparities, and Implications for Health, Justice, and Sustainability (原題)
Mahali Elizabeth Lesala, Patrick Mukumba
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
南アフリカはほぼ全世帯が送電網に接続済みだが、不十分・不安定・高価なエネルギーに苦しむ世帯が多い。本レビューは143件の文献を基に、所得・ジェンダー・地域・州別のエネルギー貧困の要因と格差、健康・福祉・環境への影響、政策対応を整理する。多次元エネルギー貧困・エネルギー正義・惑星健康を結ぶ枠組みを提案し、接続後の貧困の持続と不平等な分布は一貫して確認される一方、その帰結の証拠は弱いと結論づける。
English
South Africa has near-universal grid access, yet many connected households face inadequate, unreliable, and unaffordable energy. This review of 143 sources examines drivers and disparities of household energy poverty by income, gender, location, and province, its links to health, welfare, and environment, and policy responses. It proposes a framework linking structural drivers, energy conditions, well-being, and policy via multidimensional energy poverty, energy justice, and planetary health, finding persistent and unequal energy poverty after connection but weaker evidence on consequences.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では家庭のエネルギー貧困は燃料価格・電力料金・断熱性能の議論として顕在化しつつあり、公正な移行（GX）政策設計やエネルギー料金支援の議論に示唆を与える。ただし南アフリカ固有の文脈が強く、日本のSSBJ・有報開示への直接の示唆は限定的。
In the global GX context
Energy poverty after connection is a blind spot in global disclosure frameworks, which track access and emissions but rarely affordability or reliability. The paper's energy-justice and planetary-health framing offers a counterweight to purely decarbonization-driven transition metrics, relevant to just-transition finance and CSRD social-disclosure debates.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:多次元エネルギー貧困とエネルギー正義を結ぶ分析枠組みと、証拠の一貫性・混在・不足を整理した評価が参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:新興国市場での電力アクセス・料金リスクを社会影響評価に組み込む際の視点を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:接続率だけでなく料金負担・信頼性・安全性を含む家庭エネルギー福祉を政策指標とする必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Although South Africa has achieved near-universal grid electrification, many connected households experience inadequate, unreliable, and unaffordable energy. This review asks why energy poverty persists despite improved access, a question at the intersection of social inequality, human health, and environmental sustainability, the core concerns of planetary health. Drawing on 143 sources (peer-reviewed studies, reports, and theses) from a structured search of Scopus and Google Scholar (1994–2026) and citation tracking, the review examines conceptual foundations, drivers, and disparities of household energy poverty by income, gender, location, and province; its associations with welfare, health, education, livelihoods, and the environment; and South Africa’s policy responses. Building on South African reviews that addressed measurement within the Just Energy Transition or focused on rural households, it makes three contributions: it covers urban, peri-urban, informal, and rural settings; it proposes a conceptual framework linking structural drivers, household energy conditions, well-being and environmental outcomes, and policy responses through multidimensional energy poverty, energy justice, and planetary health; and it appraises where the evidence is consistent, mixed, or limited. Evidence of the persistence and unequal distribution of energy poverty after connection is consistent, whereas evidence of its consequences is weaker. Energy transitions are not driven by electrification or decarbonization alone but by household energy well-being: whether households can obtain adequate, affordable, reliable, and safe energy that supports health and livelihoods while reducing environmental harm. Limitations include purposive source selection and mostly cross-sectional evidence; most reported relationships should therefore be read as associations rather than demonstrated causal effects.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/challe17040042first seen 2026-11-07 04:40:07
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。