Intra-environmental Conflicts in the Context of the Sustainable Energy Transition at the EU Level: Analyzing the Respective Legislative Developments (RED III Directive) and the Role of the Principles of EU Environmental Law
持続可能なエネルギー移行における環境内対立：EU環境法原則の役割とRED III指令の分析 (AI 翻訳)
Vasiliki Karageorgou
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、EUの再生可能エネルギー指令（RED III）において、気候関連の利益が他の環境利益よりも優先されることで生じる「環境内対立」を分析する。結論として、EU環境法の原則はこうした優先順位付けを制限する重要な役割を果たすが、RED IIIの規制選択は原則の基準を完全には満たしていないことを指摘する。
English
This paper analyzes intra-environmental conflicts in the EU's Renewable Energy Directive (RED III), where climate interests are prioritized over other environmental interests. It concludes that EU environmental law principles play a critical role in limiting such prioritization, but RED III's regulatory choices do not fully comply with the criteria set by these principles.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、GX推進法に基づくエネルギー移行と環境保護のバランスが課題となっている。EUのRED IIIにおける環境内対立の分析は、日本の再生可能エネルギー促進政策やSSBJの開示基準においても、異なる環境目的間の調整の参考となる。
In the global GX context
This paper addresses the tension between climate goals and other environmental objectives in EU energy law, which is relevant to global discussions on sustainable transition. The analysis of RED III and EU environmental principles offers insights for jurisdictions like the US and Japan that are scaling up renewables while balancing biodiversity and land-use concerns.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Highlights the normative role of environmental principles in resolving intra-environmental conflicts in energy transition law.
🏢実務担当者:Provides legal context for companies navigating EU renewable energy projects and compliance with RED III.
🏛政策担当者:Offers a critical assessment of how EU environmental principles should guide legislative prioritization in energy transition.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The main research question which the article aims to address concerns whether the EU environmental principles can provide normative guidance for the resolution of intra-environmental conflicts. These conflicts arise from legal instruments, such as the Renewable Energy Directive (RED) III, that aim to promote the growth of projects for renewable energy sources as a critical means of promoting the sustainable energy transition. The first conclusion is that these conflicts are resolved in favor of climate-related interests and at the expense of other environmental interests in the context of the RED III Directive. A second conclusion is that the EU environmental principles are critical in limiting the prioritization of one category of environmental interests over others. Therefore, critical regulatory choices made in the RED III Directive do not comply with the criteria arising from the environmental principles.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.2026cfirst seen 2026-07-24 05:26:09
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。