カナダ大西洋岸における気候資金の交差的公平性の評価
Assessing intersectional inequities in climate finance across Atlantic Canada (原題)
Edmund Yirenkyi, Amanda Asiamah
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、カナダ大西洋岸（ノバスコシア州を主な事例）における政府・慈善気候資金の分配とアクセスの不公平性を、交差的気候正義の枠組みで分析。22件のインタビューと文書分析から、制度的・個人的・環境的障壁が小規模自治体や疎外されたコミュニティに複合的な不利益をもたらすことを示す。参加型で公正な資金提供の必要性を提言。
English
This study examines intersectional inequities in government and philanthropic climate finance in Atlantic Canada, focusing on Nova Scotia. Using qualitative interviews and document analysis, it identifies institutional, individual, and environmental barriers that disproportionately disadvantage smaller municipalities and marginalized communities. It advocates for participatory, justice-oriented approaches to equitable climate finance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、地域間の気候資金格差や自治体の能力不足が課題となる中、本研究成果は地方自治体や地域コミュニティへの資金配分の公平性を考える上で示唆に富む。ただし、日本の制度とは異なるため、参考程度。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global discourse on climate finance equity, highlighting subnational barriers and the need for capacity-building. It offers insights for international frameworks like the Just Transition and climate justice, relevant for policymakers designing inclusive funding mechanisms.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a framework for analyzing intersectional inequities in climate finance distribution.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights barriers that grassroots and small organizations face in accessing climate funds.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests participatory and justice-oriented approaches to improve equitable climate finance.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Climate change poses acute risks to Atlantic Canada’s communities, economies, and ecosystems, yet access to climate finance across the region remains deeply uneven. This study examines intersectional inequities in the distribution and access to government and philanthropic climate finance in Atlantic Canada, with a primary case study of Nova Scotia. Drawing on an intersectional climate justice framework, the study analyzes qualitative data from 22 semi-structured interviews with philanthropic funders, municipal and provincial government officials, and NGO representatives, supplemented by document analysis of key funding programs. Findings reveal that access to climate finance is systematically shaped by capacity deficits at three interconnected levels: institutional barriers, including complex application processes and fragmented governance; individual barriers, including limited grant-writing expertise and insufficient technical staff; and environmental barriers, including environmental racism, colonial legacies, and regional fiscal dependency. Smaller municipalities, grassroots organizations, and historically marginalized communities, including racialized and Indigenous communities, face compounding disadvantages across all three levels. The study contributes an integrated, intersectional, and capacity-focused analysis of public and philanthropic climate finance at the subnational scale, concluding that equitable climate finance demands participatory, justice-oriented approaches that center those most vulnerable to climate impacts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-026-00957-0first seen 2026-09-04 04:59:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。