Energy communities in the energy transition: A research-practice agenda from the Netherlands
エネルギー転換におけるエネルギーコミュニティ：オランダからの研究・実践アジェンダ (AI 翻訳)
Daniel Petrovics, Thomas Bauwens, Björn Hoops, Lea Diestelmeier, Floor Alkemade, Frans Coenen, Javanshir Fouladvand, Amineh Ghorbani, Johanna Höffken, Thomas Hoppe, Nenya Jochemsen, René Kemp, Matthijs Punt, Pepijn Quast, Luc van Summeren, Beau Warbroek, Anna Wieczorek, Julia M. Wittmayer, Mendel Giezen, Ilonka Marselis +2
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、オランダのエネルギーコミュニティの現状と課題を分析し、研究・実践アジェンダを提示する。2024年時点で702の協同組合が約13万9千人の会員を擁し、全自治体の約90%に及ぶ。コミュニティは再生可能エネルギーの受容性向上、地域資本の動員、エネルギーリテラシー向上に寄与するが、法制度・政策・技術的枠組みが実践に追いついていない。規制、正当性、正義、影響評価、システム統合、スケーリングの課題を解決するための研究優先事項を提案する。
English
This paper analyzes the current state and challenges of energy communities in the Netherlands and proposes a research-practice agenda. By 2024, 702 cooperatives engaged over 139,000 members across nearly 90% of municipalities. Communities can accelerate and democratize the energy transition by raising acceptance of renewables, mobilizing local capital, and building energy literacy, but legal, policy, and technical frameworks lag behind practice. The authors identify unresolved tensions in regulation, legitimacy, justice, impact evaluation, system integration, and scaling, and suggest research priorities to align rules and markets with citizen-led innovation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、地域共生型の再生可能エネルギー導入が課題となっており、エネルギーコミュニティの知見は、地域主導の脱炭素化やエネルギー自治の促進に示唆を与える。特に、農山漁村での再エネ事業や、地域新電力の活性化に参考になる。
In the global GX context
Globally, energy communities are recognized as key actors in the energy transition, but their institutionalization varies. This Dutch perspective offers insights into how polycentric governance and cooperative ecosystems can be leveraged, providing a framework for other countries to contextualize. It contributes to the literature on citizen participation, energy justice, and decentralized energy systems.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a research agenda for energy communities, highlighting gaps in regulation, legitimacy, justice, and system integration.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for energy cooperatives and local initiatives on scaling and integrating with existing systems.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests policy priorities to support energy communities, such as aligning legal frameworks and market rules.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Energy communities are no longer peripheral experiments in Europe but central actors in the energy transition. Their growth and institutionalization is particularly observable in the Dutch context. By 2024, 702 cooperatives engaged over 139,000 members across nearly 90% of municipalities - evidence that the energy transition is societal as much as technical. In the Dutch context, communities can accelerate and democratise change by raising acceptance of renewable energy projects, mobilising local capital and building energy literacy and trust. The Netherlands is a uniquely fertile testbed for integrating bottom-up change: a polycentric governance setting, a dense cooperative ecosystem, rapid digitalisation and high distributed generation all push communities beyond renewable energy deployment towards new activities, such as storage and demand-side flexibility. Yet, practice still outpaces legal, policy and technical frameworks. Unresolved tensions in regulation, legitimacy, justice, impact evaluation, system integration, and scaling reveal that energy communities remain under-leveraged. This perspective advances a research agenda to close that gap, co-created with Energie Samen, the Dutch federation of energy communities, and informed by targeted literature synthesis, roundtables, and practitioner interviews, to pinpoint where knowledge is most urgently needed to align rules and markets with citizen-led innovation. While our perspective is focused on the Netherlands, the lessons are transposable if contextualized to other legal, market and social conditions. Accordingly, we suggest that without deliberate coordination between research, policy, and practice, the potential of energy communities will be left on the table just when it matters most.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115484first seen 2026-08-10 04:44:30
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。