← 論文一覧に戻る

東アフリカにおける持続可能な電化:分散型再生可能エネルギー技術の可能性を探る

Sustainable Electrification in East Africa: Exploring the Potential of Decentralized Renewable Energy Technologies (原題)

Adamaagashi Izuchukwu

WORLD JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-10-01#エネルギー転換対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.56201/wjimt.v9.no6.2025.pg193.211
原典: https://doi.org/10.56201/wjimt.v9.no6.2025.pg193.211
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

ケニア・ウガンダ・ルワンダを対象に、太陽光家庭システムやミニグリッド、クリーン調理器などの分散型再エネ技術(DRET)の導入・性能・社会経済的影響を文献・政策文書・業界報告から評価した定性研究。農村電化の拡大や生計改善、起業促進、環境負荷低減に寄与する一方、初期費用の高さ、信用アクセスの制約、政策の不整合、技術人材不足、社会的受容の低さが障壁となる。政策枠組み強化、多様な資金調達、人材育成、住民参加、地域協力を柱とする多次元的な提言を示す。

English

A qualitative secondary-research study assessing how decentralized renewable energy technologies (solar home systems, mini-grids, clean cookstoves) affect energy access and sustainable development in Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. DRETs expand rural electrification, improve livelihoods, spur entrepreneurship, and reduce environmental degradation, but face high upfront costs, limited affordable credit, regulatory inconsistency, weak technical capacity, and low social acceptance. The authors recommend stronger policy frameworks, diversified financing, local capacity building, inclusive participation, and regional collaboration.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本企業にとって直接の制度接続は薄いが、アフリカの分散型電化はオフグリッド事業・クリーン調理器・炭素クレジット案件の投資機会として、商社やエネルギー企業のGX事業戦略に関連しうる。

In the global GX context

Adds grassroots evidence on decentralized electrification to the global energy-access and just-transition literature, relevant to SDG7 finance and blended-finance/transition-finance debates, though it does not engage TCFD/ISSB disclosure frameworks directly.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:アフリカの分散型電化における社会経済効果と制度的障壁の整理として参照できる。

🏢実務担当者:オフグリッド・クリーン調理分野への投資や案件形成時の現地リスク要因の把握に有用。

🏛政策担当者:分散型再エネ普及に向けた規制整合・資金アクセス・人材育成策の政策的示唆を提供する。

📄 Abstract(原文)

This research critically explores the impact of decentralized renewable energy technologies (DRETs) on energy access and sustainable development in East Africa, with a specific focus on Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. Utilizing a qualitative secondary research methodology, the study synthesizes scholarly literature, policy documents, and industry reports to evaluate the adoption, performance, and socioeconomic implications of DRETs such as solar home systems, mini-grids, and clean cookstoves. Findings indicate that DRETs have significantly contributed to expanding rural electrification, improving livelihoods, fostering entrepreneurship, and reducing environmental degradation. However, the research also identifies persistent challenges, including high upfront financing costs, limited access to affordable credit, policy and regulatory inconsistencies, inadequate technical capacity, and low social acceptance in some communities. To address these barriers, the study proposes a multidimensional set of recommendations: strengthening policy and regulatory frameworks; improving access to diverse financing mechanisms; investing in local technical training and capacity building; promoting inclusive community participation; and enhancing regional collaboration for knowledge sharing and harmonized standards. The study concludes that while decentralized renewable energy offers transformative potential for East Africa’ s energy future, realizing this vision demands sustained political commitment, targeted investments, and inclusive strategies that prioritize local needs and ownership. These efforts are essential to accelerating progress toward universal energy access, climate resilience, and the broader sustainable development goals (SDGs) across the region

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。