Contentious Imaginaries of Energy Transition in Tunisia
チュニジアにおけるエネルギー移行をめぐる対立的想像 (AI 翻訳)
Nathalie Ferré, Philipp Wagner, Alessandra Bonci, Áron Buzogány
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、チュニジアの再生可能エネルギー移行が、包摂的で主権重視の未来像と、輸出志向で「緑の収奪」を再生産するプロジェクト（TuNur太陽光輸出、Elmed連系線）との対立の場となっていることを論じる。EUのグリーンディールやRePowerEUに後押しされたユーロ地中海インフラ戦略が、北側の蓄積を支える非対称な交換関係を生む可能性を指摘し、立法改革を通じて新自由主義的想像が具体化する過程を描く。移行は直線的な脱炭素経路ではなく、法・インフラ・政治権威をめぐる多層的紛争の場であると結論づける。
English
This chapter examines Tunisia's renewable energy transition as a site of contentious politics, where inclusive and sovereignty-oriented futures clash with export-oriented projects like TuNur and Elmed that risk green extractivism. It argues that Euro-Mediterranean infrastructure strategies, accelerated by the European Green Deal and RePowerEU, may create asymmetric exchange relations favoring Northern accumulation. The authors trace how transnational actors and national elites co-produce neoliberal imaginaries through legislative changes, showing that the transition is a contested arena, not a linear decarbonization pathway.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、エネルギー移行の国際的な権力関係や地政学的側面への理解を深める上で示唆的。特に、日本の再エネ輸出構想やアジア地域でのインフラ協力における公正性の議論に応用可能。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global GX scholarship by highlighting the geopolitical and justice dimensions of renewable energy transitions, relevant for ISSB/CSRD discussions on social impacts and for transition finance frameworks that must consider equitable partnerships.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー移行の政治経済学と植民地主義的想像の連続性に関する理論的枠組みを提供。
🏢実務担当者:国際再エネプロジェクトの社会的受容性やリスク評価に示唆を与える。
🏛政策担当者:国際エネルギー協力における非対称関係と公正な移行の政策設計に注意を促す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This chapter examines how Tunisia’s renewable energy transition has become a site of contentious politics in which competing sociotechnical imaginaries of the future collide: inclusive and sovereignty-oriented energy futures on the one hand, and transnational export-oriented projects that risk reproducing forms of “green extractivism” on the other. Focusing on the TuNur solar export initiative and the Elmed interconnector, the chapter asks whether emerging Euro-Mediterranean infrastructure strategies, accelerated by the European Green Deal and RePowerEU, pave the way for new asymmetric exchange relations in which renewable resources (sun, wind) and associated infrastructure are mobilized to sustain accumulation in the North. The chapter traces how transnational actors (EU institutions, development banks, IFIs, donor agencies such as GIZ), national political and economic elites, law firms, and business associations co-produce neoliberal and export-oriented imaginaries translate into concrete legislative change, most notably the legal opening of Tunisia’s electricity sector via authorization and concession regimes and reforms enabling direct sales and export possibilities. The chapter demonstrates that Tunisia’s transition is not a linear “decarbonization pathway” but a contested arena in which colonial imaginaries of the desert as Europe’s energy hinterland are reactivated and actively resisted through multilevel conflicts over law, infrastructure, and political authority.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003730750-11first seen 2026-08-06 04:48:28
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。