🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ベトナムの自主的炭素市場(VCM)における炭素クレジット取引の法的枠組みを分析する。環境保護法2020年や関連政令を調査し、国際基準との比較から、法的定義、所有権、MRVメカニズム、税務、会計、紛争解決における欠陥を指摘する。改善策として、透明性の確保、利害関係者の利益調整、地域・国際市場との連携を提案する。
English
This paper analyzes the legal framework for carbon credit trading on Vietnam's Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM) in the context of net-zero by 2050. It reviews Party documents and current laws (Environmental Protection Law 2020, Decrees 06/2022, 119/2025, Decision 232) and compares with international standards. Shortcomings are identified in legal definitions, ownership, MRV, taxation, accounting, and dispute resolution. Recommendations aim to enhance transparency, harmonize interests, and link with regional/global markets.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
ベトナムの炭素クレジット法制度の分析は、日本がJ-クレジット制度や二国間クレジット制度(JCM)を運用する上で参考になる。特に、自発的市場の法的明確化やMRVの課題は、日本の制度設計にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Vietnam's legal framework for voluntary carbon credits offers lessons for other developing countries and for global carbon market integration. The analysis of ownership, MRV, and taxation issues contributes to the ongoing discourse on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and the design of robust carbon markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a detailed case study of Vietnam's carbon credit legislation, useful for comparative legal research on carbon markets.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights legal and operational challenges in voluntary carbon credit trading that corporate sustainability teams should consider when engaging with Vietnamese projects.
🏛政策担当者:Offers insights for regulators designing or updating legal frameworks for carbon markets, particularly in emerging economies.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This article analyzes the legal framework governing carbon credit trading on the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM) in Vietnam in the context of achieving a net zero emission commitment by 2050. Based on a survey of Party documents, the current legal framework (Environmental Protection Law 2020, Decree 06/2022/ND-CP, Decree 119/2025/ND-CP, Decision 232/QD-TTg 2025), and a comparison with international standards (Kyoto Protocol, Paris Agreement), Based on the VCS (Gold Standard) standards, this article points out shortcomings in the legal definition, ownership rights, measurement-reporting-verification (MRV) mechanism, taxation, accounting, and dispute resolution for voluntary carbon credits. Based on this, the author proposes directions for improving the law to ensure that the voluntary carbon market in Vietnam operates transparently, harmonizes the interests of stakeholders, and is interconnected with regional and global markets.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/20505284first seen 2026-06-03 04:22:04 · last seen 2026-06-08 04:13:29
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20505284first seen 2026-06-04 04:53:01 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:49:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。