← 論文一覧に戻る

歴史的建造物の省エネルギー改修：脱炭素化、保全適合型改修戦略、持続可能な観光のマッピングと石造礼拝所への示唆

Energy-Efficient Restoration of Historic Buildings: Mapping Decarbonization, Conservation-Compatible Retrofit Strategies, and Sustainable Tourism with Implications for Stone Places of Worship (原題)

Lale Karataş Billor, Muhammet Abdulmecit Kınıklı, Fatih Ünal

Buildings📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-20#省エネOrigin: Global対象セクター: construction
DOI: 10.3390/buildings16163315
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16163315

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、歴史的建造物の省エネ改修、脱炭素化、保全、持続可能な観光に関する文献をWeb of Scienceから804件収集し、計量書誌学的手法で分析した。共引用分析により欧州の保全微気候と適応的再利用の2つの学派を特定し、書誌結合分析で5つの研究フロント（HBIM含む）を抽出した。2019年以降、観光・管理と保全研究の収束が見られる一方、技術的エネルギー研究との分離が続く。統合的モニタリング、HBIM統合、国際共同研究の強化を提言する。

English

This study analyzes 804 publications on energy-efficient restoration, decarbonization, heritage conservation, and sustainable tourism of historic buildings using bibliometric methods. Co-citation analysis reveals two intellectual schools: European conservation microclimate and adaptive reuse management. Bibliographic coupling identifies five research fronts, including adaptive reuse, microclimate-conservation-energy, and emerging HBIM/digital documentation. Thematic evolution shows post-2019 convergence of tourism and management with conservation, but continued separation from technical energy streams. The study proposes integrated monitoring, HBIM integration, and stronger cross-national collaboration.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では歴史的建造物の保全と脱炭素化の両立が課題であり、SSBJ開示や観光需要への対応が求められる。本稿の文献マッピングは、日本の文化財建造物の改修戦略を検討する際の研究動向整理に有用。ただし、実証データは乏しく、政策立案には追加のケーススタディが必要。

In the global GX context

Globally, this bibliometric study maps the fragmented research landscape on historic building decarbonization, relevant to ISSB/CSRD disclosure for heritage assets and sustainable tourism. It highlights the need for integrated monitoring and HBIM adoption, offering a research agenda for aligning conservation with climate goals. The findings are useful for framing international collaboration on heritage energy efficiency.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured map of research fronts and gaps in historic building energy retrofit, useful for positioning new studies.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a broad overview of retrofit strategies and the importance of HBIM, but lacks specific technical guidance for implementation.

🏛政策担当者:Signals the need for integrated policies linking heritage conservation, energy efficiency, and tourism management.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Historic buildings occupy a sensitive position in contemporary energy and heritage management because they combine building-performance requirements, material-conservation constraints, and dynamic patterns of use. This study maps the broader historic-building literature at the intersection of energy-efficient restoration, building decarbonization, heritage conservation, and sustainable tourism, and interprets the resulting bibliometric structure with particular implications for historic stone places of worship. Records were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and screened through a PRISMA 2020-aligned protocol, yielding 804 publications. Accordingly, the 804-record corpus represents a broad historic-building and heritage-management evidence base rather than an exhaustive dataset restricted exclusively to stone religious buildings. Performance analysis and science mapping were conducted using Bibliometrix, while bibliographic coupling and longitudinal thematic-evolution analyses were added to examine contemporary research fronts and their temporal continuity. Co-citation analysis identified two partially separated intellectual schools—European conservation microclimate and adaptive reuse management—whereas bibliographic coupling revealed five current research-front communities, including adaptive reuse and sustainability, microclimate-conservation-energy, and an emerging HBIM/digital-documentation front. Thematic evolution showed increasing post-2019 convergence of tourism and management with conservation and cultural-heritage research, but continued separation from technical energy and microclimate streams. The study therefore moves beyond descriptive rankings to identify structural fragmentation and three priority directions: integrated monitoring of visitor loads, energy, and conservation performance; HBIM-supported spatial integration; and stronger cross-national research collaboration. The findings are interpreted as bibliometric evidence and research-agenda signals rather than as causal proof of building or policy performance.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。