National Sustainable Development Strategies in Vietnam and the United States: A Comparative Analysis
ベトナムと米国における国家持続可能な開発戦略の比較分析 (AI 翻訳)
Dau The Tung, Tran Van Khoi, Dau Nhan Kiet, Nguyen Quoc Tuan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿はベトナムと米国の国家持続可能な開発戦略（NSDS）を比較分析する。ベトナムは貧困削減と国際気候資金を統合した「公正な移行」モデルを追求する一方、米国は国内補助金と技術革新に基づくグリーン産業政策アプローチを重視する。両国の脱炭素化と再生可能エネルギーへのコミットメントを確認しつつ、制度的非対称性と資金調達構造の違いが課題であると指摘する。
English
This paper compares the national sustainable development strategies (NSDS) of Vietnam and the United States. Vietnam pursues a centrally coordinated 'just transition' model integrating poverty alleviation and international climate finance, while the US emphasizes a green industrial policy approach driven by domestic subsidies and technological innovation. Both countries share commitments to decarbonization and renewable energy, but face challenges from institutional asymmetry and divergent financing structures.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はアジアの途上国との協力において、ベトナムのような公正な移行モデルと米国の産業政策の両方を参考にできる。日本のGX政策（GXリーグ、カーボンプライシング）との比較にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This comparative analysis offers insights for global North-South cooperation frameworks, relevant to transition finance and just transition discussions under the Paris Agreement. It highlights how different institutional contexts shape sustainable development strategies, informing policy design in both developed and developing countries.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparison of two distinct NSDS models, contributing to comparative policy literature on sustainable development.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into how different national contexts shape sustainability strategies, useful for multinational corporations operating in Vietnam or the US.
🏛政策担当者:Presents actionable recommendations for bilateral cooperation, including blended finance and technology transfer, relevant for international climate diplomacy.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract This article offers a comparative analysis of the national sustainable development strategies (NSDS) of Vietnam and the United States, applying a four-dimensional framework covering political–institutional, economic, social–human, and environmental–technological aspects. While Vietnam pursues a centrally coordinated “just transition” model integrating poverty alleviation and international climate finance, the United States emphasizes a green industrial policy approach driven by domestic subsidies and technological innovation. Using a qualitative comparative case study design, the paper synthesizes policy documents, international reports, and academic literature to highlight key differences and complementarities between the two models. The findings reveal both countries’ shared commitment to decarbonization, renewable energy, and human capital development, yet underscore challenges posed by institutional asymmetry and divergent financing structures. The study proposes actionable recommendations for bilateral cooperation under the upgraded Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, including blended finance, technology transfer, and decentralized governance partnerships. This research contributes to the comparative policy literature on sustainable development and offers policy-relevant insights into emerging North–South collaboration frameworks.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7669207/v1first seen 2026-05-05 19:07:30
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。