統合的な水・炭素管理による気候スマート水稲生産:メタン削減、バイオ炭、収量レジリエンス
Climate-Smart Rice Production through Integrated Water and Carbon Management: Methane Mitigation, Biochar and Yield Resilience (原題)
(著者不明)
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
水田からのメタン削減・水管理・バイオ炭・収量レジリエンスを統合的管理戦略として評価したレビュー。間断灌漑(AWD)が最も確実な短期削減策だが、N2O増加や収量への影響は乾燥程度・土壌・品種に依存する。バイオ炭は収量・土壌炭素を改善するがメタン削減効果は不安定。水管理を主軸とし、バイオ炭・窒素管理・品種を状況依存の調整層とする階層的戦略を提唱する。
English
A critical review integrating methane mitigation, water management, biochar and yield resilience in rice paddies. Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) is the strongest near-term lever for cutting methane and irrigation demand, though N2O often rises and yield effects depend on drying severity, soil and cultivar. Biochar improves yield and soil carbon but methane mitigation is inconsistent. The authors propose a hierarchical strategy: water regime first, biochar/nitrogen as modifiers, cultivar as a resilience layer.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の水稲は農業由来メタンの主要排出源であり、J-クレジット制度では水稲の間断灌漑やバイオ炭施用が方法論として整備されつつある。本レビューは、AWDとバイオ炭の併用効果や収量安定性の限界を整理しており、農林水産省の「みどりの食料システム戦略」や食品企業のScope3算定・削減目標の科学的根拠として参照価値が高い。
In the global GX context
Agriculture accounts for roughly 10% of global GHG emissions, and rice paddies are a major methane source. This review informs corporate Scope 3 agriculture accounting, SBTi FLAG target setting, and emerging carbon-credit methodologies for AWD and biochar. It also highlights the need for integrated measurement frameworks (water status, GHGs, yield stability) that align with MRV requirements under voluntary carbon markets and disclosure regimes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:水田メタン削減と収量・N2O・汚染物質とのトレードオフを統合的に整理したレビューとして、今後の要因試験設計やライフサイクル評価研究の出発点になる。
🏢実務担当者:AWD導入時の乾燥程度の管理とバイオ炭の併用が、メタン削減と収量安定の両立に有効かを見極める際の実務的指針となる。
🏛政策担当者:J-クレジットやみどり戦略における水稲メタン削減方法論の設計に、AWDの強度管理やバイオ炭の条件依存性を反映させる必要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract(原文)
Rice production occupies a difficult position in climate-smart agriculture because flooded paddy soils support high and stable yields yet create conditions favourable to methane formation, consume substantial irrigation water, and can alter the availability of potentially toxic elements in grain. This critical narrative review evaluates whether methane mitigation, water management, biochar amendment and yield resilience can be integrated into a coherent management strategy rather than treated as separate objectives. Literature published from 2000 to 3 July 2026 was considered, with earlier foundational evidence retained selectively where necessary. The strongest and most consistent evidence supports non-continuous flooding, particularly well-managed alternate wetting and drying (AWD), as the principal near-term field lever for lowering methane emissions and irrigation demand. Across recent meta-analyses, methane reductions are substantial, but nitrous oxide commonly increases, and yield responses depend strongly on drying severity, timing, soil properties, nitrogen supply and cultivar. Mild AWD is therefore better supported than severe drying as a production-compatible mitigation practice. Biochar can improve rice yield, nitrogen-use efficiency and soil carbon status while moderating greenhouse-gas emissions, but average methane mitigation is less consistent than that achieved through water management and is highly contingent on feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, application rate, soil properties and mineral nitrogen input. Direct factorial evidence combining AWD and biochar is still limited, although several multi-year field studies indicate that biochar can partly buffer nutrient losses, contaminant trade-offs and physiological constraints associated with soil drying. Evidence that AWD itself increases yield resilience to drought or heat is mechanistically plausible but remains cultivar- and experiment-specific; it should not yet be equated with proven long-term yield stability under climate extremes. The synthesis supports a hierarchical strategy in which water regime is the primary control, biochar and nitrogen management are context-dependent modifiers, and cultivar choice provides a resilience layer. Future progress requires multi-site factorial trials, explicit life-cycle accounting, multi-contaminant grain-safety assessment and measurement frameworks that verify water status, greenhouse gases and yield stability together.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://journalarja.com/index.php/ARJA/article/download/912/2248first seen 2026-09-12 05:18:23 · last seen 2026-09-22 04:55:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。