SECAP行動の優先順位付けのための参加型多基準意思決定フレームワーク：欧州都市からのエビデンス
A participatory multi-criteria decision framework for prioritizing SECAP actions: evidence from European cities (原題)
Mia Dragović Matosović, Danai Sofia Exintaveloni, Giulia Pizzini
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、自治体が気候・エネルギー行動を優先順位付けするための参加型多基準意思決定（MCDA）フレームワークを提示する。環境・経済・社会・技術・制度の5次元に加え、政治的受容性や実施能力、部門間シナジーを明示的に組み込む。ザグレブ、マリボル、リトメルジツェのSECAPに適用した結果、宣言された野心と実際の計画優先度に体系的な乖離があり、制度・経済的実現可能性が意思決定を支配する一方、環境・社会的便益が過小評価されていることが示された。
English
This paper presents a participatory multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to help municipalities prioritize climate and energy actions under governance and resource constraints. Integrating environmental, economic, social, technical and institutional dimensions with political acceptability and implementation capacity, it is applied to SECAPs in Zagreb, Maribor and Litoměřice. Results reveal systematic misalignment between declared ambitions and implicit priorities, with institutional and economic feasibility dominating while environmental and social benefits are underweighted. Over 80% of actions showed untapped mitigation-adaptation synergies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では自治体の地球温暖化対策実行計画（区域施策編）や気候変動適応計画の策定・更新が進むが、施策の優先順位付けは依然として政治的・予算的制約に左右されやすい。本フレームワークは、限られたリソース下で透明性と説明責任を高める手法として、日本の自治体計画担当者や地方創生・脱炭素先行地域の実務に示唆を与える。国・EUの気候目標との整合を図る視点も、日本の地域脱炭素政策の政策整合性向上に参考となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, this work speaks to the implementation gap in local climate planning under the EU Covenant of Mayors and SECAP framework, offering a replicable method for ex-ante prioritization and ex-post evaluation. It contributes to the broader climate governance literature by showing how participatory MCDA can surface mitigation-adaptation synergies and align local action with national and EU climate objectives. For international disclosure scholarship, it highlights the institutional and political determinants of plan implementation that often remain invisible in formal reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Participatory MCDA design and empirical evidence on local climate plan prioritization across three European cities.
🏢実務担当者:A lightweight, replicable framework for prioritizing climate actions and identifying mitigation-adaptation synergies in municipal planning.
🏛政策担当者:Insight into how institutional and economic feasibility shape local climate action selection, useful for designing support mechanisms that align local plans with national and EU targets.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Cities are central to climate action but face fragmented governance, competing objectives and resource constraints. Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (SECAPs) and similar local climate plans are widely adopted, yet implementation tends to reflect political feasibility and institutional capacity more than stated sustainability goals. This paper presents a participatory multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework designed to support municipalities in prioritizing climate and energy actions under such constraints. The framework integrates five dimensions – environmental, economic, social, technical and institutional – while explicitly incorporating political acceptability, implementation capacity and cross-sectoral synergies. Applied to SECAPs of Zagreb (Croatia), Maribor (Slovenia) and Litoměřice (Czechia), it reveals systematic misalignments between declared ambitions and implicit planning priorities. Results show that institutional and economic feasibility dominate decision-making, while environmental and social benefits are often underweighted. Sensitivity testing highlights how different decision-makers’ value orientations shift action rankings, yet the stability of top priorities demonstrates the framework’s robustness. By identifying overlooked synergies, the framework enables more transparent, inclusive and cost-effective planning. More than 80% of actions across case cities also exhibited untapped synergies between mitigation and adaptation. Unlike conventional benchmarking tools, it provides municipalities with a lightweight, replicable method for both ex-ante prioritization and ex-post evaluation of local climate plans. Beyond immediate planning support, the framework strengthens institutional learning, enhances policy coherence and helps align local implementation with broader national and EU climate objectives.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33829058first seen 2026-10-04 04:38:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。