Spatiotemporal evolution of the Co-reduction of carbon emissions and air pollutants and the drivers of carbon mitigation: Evidence from a city-sector-industry perspective in China.
中国の都市・産業別視点からの炭素排出と大気汚染物質の同時削減の時空間的進化と炭素削減の要因 (AI 翻訳)
Shian Zeng, Xufeng Zhu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、中国の都市スケールで全セクター及び電力、産業、運輸、民生の4部門、さらに省スケールで11産業のデータを用い、CO2とSO2、NOx、PM2.5、COの同時削減レベルを測定。2006~2020年にかけて中国全体の同時削減は大幅に向上し、空間的には東から西へ拡散、都市間格差は縮小した。産業部門では逆U字、電力ではN字など部門ごとに異なるパターンが見られ、エネルギー構造と消費強度が主要な削減要因である。
English
This study measures the co-reduction level of CO2 and air pollutants (SO2, NOx, PM2.5, CO) in China using city-scale all-sector and four-sector data (power, industry, transport, residential) and provincial-scale 11-industry data. From 2006-2020, overall co-reduction improved significantly with a spatial diffusion from east to west and narrowing inter-city disparities. Sectoral patterns vary (inverted-U for industry, N-shaped for power), and energy structure and consumption intensity are key drivers.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国全土の詳細な都市・産業データに基づく同時削減分析は、日本における地域別・産業別の脱炭素・大気汚染対策の統合推進に示唆を与える。特に、SSBJ対応や自治体の気候変動計画策定において、複数部門の連携効果を評価する手法として参考になる。
In the global GX context
This city-sector-industry level analysis of co-reduction in China provides empirical evidence on the synergies between carbon mitigation and air pollution control, relevant to global discussions on integrated climate and environmental policies. The methodologies (CCECS, CCD, LMDI) can be applied to assess co-benefits in other national contexts.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis framework and empirical results on co-reduction of carbon and air pollutants across sectors and cities in China.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for corporate sustainability teams on sector-specific co-reduction dynamics, helpful for setting emission reduction targets aligned with local air quality goals.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of coordinated sectoral policies and spatial targeting for maximizing co-benefits of carbon and air pollution reduction.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Existing studies have primarily focused on the co-reduction of carbon dioxide and air pollutants (CDAP) at the provincial level, in key regions, or within single sectors, while systematic analyses at the city scale, across multiple sectors, and at the disaggregated industry level remain limited. Based on all-sector data and data for four major sectors (power generation, industry, transportation, and residential use) at the city scale, together with data for 11 disaggregated industries at the provincial scale, this study applies the co-control effects coordinate system (CCECS) method and the coupling coordination degree (CCD) model to measure the level of co-reduction between carbon dioxide and major air pollutants (SO2, NOx, PM2.5 and CO). By integrating ArcGIS-based spatial analysis, LMDI decomposition, and econometric regression models, this study reveals the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of co-reduction and the drivers of carbon mitigation. The results show that: (1) during the period 2006-2020, the overall level of co-reduction of CDAP in China increased significantly, with the spatial pattern exhibiting a diffusion trend from eastern to western regions and a gradual narrowing of inter-city disparities in coordination; (2) the CCD of the co-reduction of CDAP in the industrial, power generation, transportation, and residential sectors respectively exhibits inverted U-shaped, N-shaped, Z-shaped, and oscillatory variation patterns; and (3) the energy structure intensity effect and the energy consumption intensity effect are the primary driving factors of carbon mitigation, while the co-reduction effects of CDAP display significant heterogeneity across different sectors and industries.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129891first seen 2026-07-25 06:04:23
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。