Missions, Myths, and Contemporary Procedural Governance Tools: Reflections and a Proposed Research Agenda
ミッション、神話、そして現代の手続き的ガバナンスツール：考察と今後の研究課題の提案 (AI 翻訳)
Terwilliger, Joel
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿はEUシティズ・ミッションのアプローチを批判的に評価し、3Ms分析レンズとガバナンスイノベーション三脚モデルを提示。ネットゼロ移行におけるガバナンス、社会、金融、学習の革新を分析し、今後の研究課題を提案する。
English
This brief critically evaluates the EU Cities Mission approach using the 3Ms lens (Myths, Mechanisms, Productive Margins) and introduces the Governance Innovation Tripod. It synthesizes insights on net zero governance and proposes a four-part research agenda focused on credentialism, process indicators, co-benefits, and regional scale.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
EUの都市脱炭素ミッションの事例分析だが、ガバナンスイノベーションの枠組みは日本の自治体のネットゼロ戦略立案に参考となる可能性がある。
In the global GX context
This paper critically assesses the EU Cities Mission and NetZeroCities platform, offering a governance innovation tripod that can inform global net zero governance design, especially for multi-level urban climate action.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a synthetic framework (Governance Innovation Tripod) and a research agenda for net zero governance scholars.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights on the gap between radical visions and implementation realities for city-level net zero programs.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need to recognize and resource 'productive margins' in mission-oriented climate governance.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Fifth and final brief in the Net Zero Futures Research Series. Critically evaluates the EU Cities Mission approach against its foundational vision, drawing on Mazzucato's mission-oriented framework and Mulgan's 2x2 framework of incremental vs. radical institutional design. Applies the 3Ms analytical lens — Myths, Mechanisms, and Productive Margins — across all four innovation domains (governance, social, financial, and learning) to assess what the NetZeroCities and UK Net Zero Living platform approaches have achieved and where they fall short. Introduces the Governance Innovation Tripod, positioning learning innovation as the stabilising force that holds governance, social, and financial innovation together through institutional repair cycles. Synthesises cumulative insights across all five briefs and proposes a four-part future research agenda: (1) net zero credentialism and the gap between radicality and reality; (2) governance process indicators and the REPAIR framework; (3) co-benefits functions and decision-making practice; (4) the regional scale and productive margins. Ends with a call to recognise, resource, and connect the productive margins emerging across Bristol and fellow Mission cities.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/20595828first seen 2026-06-09 04:14:50 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:13:57
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。