エネルギー入門
Introduction to Energy (原題)
Jonathan Craig, Andrew Latham
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
エネルギー転換は地域の経済・社会事情により速度と形態が異なると概説する入門的論考。新興国での需要増大が続くなか、再生可能エネルギーの拡大後も石油・ガス・石炭への需要は当面残ると指摘する。クリーンエネルギーも環境負荷を伴い、公正な転換には排出削減・エネルギー貧困解消・需要充足の同時達成が必要だと論じる。
English
An introductory overview arguing the energy transition proceeds at different speeds and forms across geographies, shaped by local economic and social pressures. It notes rising demand in emerging economies and continued need for fossil fuels in all reasonable scenarios, while flagging material demand surges for critical metals and environmental impacts of clean energy too. A just transition must simultaneously cut emissions, reduce energy poverty, and meet growing demand.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策やSSBJ開示の直接対象ではないが、エネルギー安全保障と脱炭素の両立を議論する基礎資料として、日本のエネルギー政策論議の文脈理解に資する。
In the global GX context
Offers global disclosure scholars a framing of transition constraints—energy security, critical minerals, and just-transition tradeoffs—that underpins how ISSB/TCFD scenario analysis and transition planning must acknowledge regional heterogeneity.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー転換の速度を規定する経済・政治・社会的制約を整理する概念的枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:自社のトランジション計画策定時に、地域別のエネルギー需給とクリティカルメタル調達リスクを考慮する視点を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:排出削減・エネルギー貧困・需要増の同時達成という公正な転換の三要件を政策設計に組み込む際の論点を提示する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The “Energy Transition” is occurring at different speeds and in different forms across different geographies, depending on local economic and societal pressures. World energy demand is continuing to rise, especially in the emerging economies of India, China and Africa, driven by population growth and economic development. Despite the rapid growth in the use of renewable energy resources, in all reasonable scenarios, there will still be a need for oil, gas and coal for the foreseeable future if we are to meet the social and economic expectations of the world’s growing population. The energy mix will certainly change as we try to reduce carbon emissions, but the speed and magnitude of that change will depend heavily on national economic priorities, political will and public opinion. Demand for certain earth metals will increase materially —a 200% increase in demand for aluminium, iron, lead and nickel, and a 1000% increase in demand for cobalt, lithium and manganese have been suggested. It is important to remember that renewable energy and other “cleaner” sources of energy also have environmental impacts. It is not necessarily the fuel that is the issue, but the environmental impacts of using it. The energy transition is not as simple as doing what is right for the planet. Governments, businesses, and people in fossil fuel-producing regions have already shown they will protect their economies despite the threat of environmental harm, and most of us seem reluctant to make the changes necessary to reduce our demand for energy and our reliance on the vast range of products made from hydrocarbons. A “just” transition requires us to do three things simultaneously —reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce energy poverty, and still satisfy the world’s growing energy demand. Is this possible? How fast can we realistically move towards a low-carbon future and still meet the world’s growing demand for energy? What are the key constraints on the rate of change? The “Energy Transition” is a huge responsibility, but also a huge opportunity, one in which we all have our part to play.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://www.epj-conferences.org/10.1051/epjconf/202638800002/pdffirst seen 2026-10-24 04:38:23 · last seen 2026-10-30 04:41:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。