エネルギーアクセスからエネルギー強靱性へ：地政学的・サプライチェーンショック下のインドのクリーン調理ガバナンス
From Energy Access to Energy Resilience: India's Clean-Cooking Governance under Geopolitical and Supply-Chain Shocks (原題)
DHRITI SATYA
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インドのLPG普及はPMUYや国有石油会社を通じた大規模な社会インフラ転換だったが、2026年の地政学的・供給網混乱は「アクセス」と「強靱性」の乖離を露呈した。司法監督、中央政府介入、石油会社・販売店の実施、デジタル統制、消費者対応の5層を分析し、必須商品法やLPG統制令、Aadhaar認証、PNG拡大等の対応を評価する。適応能力は高いものの集中・インフラ・負担可能性の脆弱性が残るとし、7次元の「クリーン調理強靱性枠組み」を提案する。
English
India's LPG-based clean-cooking transition, built on PMUY and public oil marketers, was stress-tested by the 2026 geopolitical and supply-chain disruption, revealing a gap between access and resilience. The article analyses five governance layers—judicial oversight, Union intervention, OMC/distributor implementation, digital enforcement, and consumer response—covering the Essential Commodities Act, LPG Control Order, Aadhaar authentication and PNG expansion. It finds strong adaptive capacity but persistent concentration, infrastructure and affordability vulnerabilities, and proposes a seven-dimension Clean Cooking Resilience Framework.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、調理・熱利用分野の脱炭素（電化・都市ガス転換）や資源調達リスク管理の参考になるが、開示制度やScope3会計との直接の接続は薄い。
In the global GX context
Adds a Global South governance perspective to transition-resilience debates, complementing TCFD/ISSB-style physical and transition risk thinking with an energy-access lens rarely covered in corporate disclosure frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギーアクセスと強靱性を分離して捉える7次元枠組みは、公正な移行研究の分析装置として有用。
🏢実務担当者:燃料調達の集中リスクと代替手段の確保が事業継続計画に与える示唆を確認できる。
🏛政策担当者:緊急時対応を恒常的な強靱性ガバナンスへ転換する制度設計の論点を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
India’s clean-cooking transition has been one of the country’s most significant social infrastructure transformations. Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) has become the principal household clean-cooking fuel, supported by the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY), the public-sector Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) and an extensive distributor network. The geopolitical and supply-chain disruption of 2026, however, exposed a critical distinction between energy access and energy resilience. A household may possess an LPG connection while remaining vulnerable to disruptions in international supply, shipping routes, domestic production, storage, distribution or affordability. This Article examines the extent to which India’s clean-cooking governance architecture demonstrated resilience during the 2026 disruption and identifies the regulatory and institutional reforms required for the transition from LPG access to resilient clean-cooking security. It analyses five interacting governance layers: judicial oversight; Union Government intervention; OMC and distributor implementation; enforcement and digital governance; and consumer response. Particular attention is given to the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (ECA), the LPG Control Order, emergency prioritisation of domestic LPG, C3-C4 diversion, supply rationalisation, the Delivery Authentication Code (DAC), biometric Aadhaar authentication, accelerated piped natural gas (PNG) expansion and fiscal support for LPG. The Article argues that India’s response demonstrated considerable adaptive capacity, but that resilience remains incomplete because the system continues to face concentration, infrastructure and affordability vulnerabilities. It proposes an original Clean Cooking Resilience Framework based on seven dimensions: Access, Affordability, Availability, Adaptability, Accountability, Alternatives and Autonomy. The Article concludes with regulatory and institutional reforms aimed at transforming crisis response into permanent resilience governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.63108/ijlmh.13000first seen 2026-11-02 04:41:36 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:36:43
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。