Enabling change and innovation in marine governance: Lessons learnt from the Danish Bornholm Energy Island
海洋ガバナンスにおける変革とイノベーションの実現：デンマーク・ボーンホルム・エネルギーアイランドからの教訓 (AI 翻訳)
Sun Cole Seeberg Dyremose, Carolijn van Noort, Peter Sorknæs, Daniele Pagani
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、デンマークのボーンホルム・エネルギーアイランド（BEI）プロジェクトを事例に、洋上風力エネルギーハブのガバナンスにおける変革と停滞の条件を分析。多層協調的海洋ガバナンス（MLCMG）モデルを用い、利害関係者の動機の断片化、情報発信資源の不足、複雑な地政学的状況がプロジェクトの不確実性と遅延を招いたことを明らかにした。将来の洋上エネルギーハブプロジェクトへの政策提言を提供。
English
This paper examines the governance of the Danish Bornholm Energy Island (BEI) offshore wind hub, using the Multilayered Collaborative Marine Governance (MLCMG) model to analyze enabling and constraining conditions for change and innovation. It finds fragmented stakeholder motivations, lack of dissemination resources, and a complex geopolitical landscape led to project uncertainties and delays. Provides policy directions for future offshore energy hub projects.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも洋上風力の大規模展開が進む中、本論文のガバナンス分析は、利害調整や制度設計の課題に示唆を与える。特に、複数主体間の連携や情報共有の重要性は、日本の offshore wind プロジェクトにも適用可能。
In the global GX context
This case study of a major European offshore wind hub highlights governance challenges that can stall even well-funded energy transition projects. The findings on fragmented stakeholder motivations and geopolitical complexities offer valuable lessons for global offshore wind development, including emerging hubs in the US and Asia.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured analytical framework (MLCMG) and empirical case study on governance of large-scale renewable energy infrastructure.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights critical success factors for stakeholder engagement and resource allocation in offshore wind energy hub projects.
🏛政策担当者:Offers concrete policy recommendations for improving governance and avoiding delays in complex energy transition projects.
📄 Abstract（原文）
In 2020, to meet the European Green Deal goals, Denmark announced the Energy Islands: large-scale transforming stations meant to collect, convert and redistribute energy generated by offshore wind farms. One example is Bornholm Energy Island (BEI), an energy hub placed on the Danish island of Bornholm. BEI is part of a future internationally shared energy network across the Baltic Sea and has received status as a Project of Common Interest within the European Union. However, economic and environmental uncertainties, alongside disagreements about roles and responsibilities between international public institutions and industries, resulted in an indefinite pause of the project in early 2025 and a reimplementation eight months later. To understand these outcomes, this paper explores the enabling and constraining conditions connected to change, innovation, and stagnation in governance of the energy sector, looking specifically at the case of BEI. Data collection and analysis are structured using the Multilayered Collaborative Marine Governance (MLCMG) Model, which focuses on four building blocks of change and innovation in marine governance arrangements: collaboration dynamics, institutional attributes, governance capabilities, and the role of E-governance tools. Results indicate that fragmented stakeholder motivations, the lack of dissemination resources, and a complex geopolitical landscape have led to project uncertainties, increased expenses and a deficiency in stakeholder engagement. The discussion section examines the linkages between the building blocks of change and innovation in the case of BEI, providing direction for policy changes for future offshore energy hub projects.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-026-00490-zfirst seen 2026-05-15 17:11:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。