← 論文一覧に戻る

地政学的回廊混乱下における持続可能な海運燃料経路のレジリエンス:中東船隊運用のための定量的評価

Sustainable Maritime Fuel Pathway Resilience Under Geopolitical Corridor Disruption: A Quantitative Evaluation for Middle East Fleet Operations (原題)

A. Suboyin, S. Mannan, O. Baobaid, M. Tardio

ADIPEC2026-11-02#エネルギー転換経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: transport
DOI: 10.2118/235705-ms
原典: https://doi.org/10.2118/235705-ms

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

紅海迂回やホルムズ海峡制限などの地政学的混乱が、バイオ燃料・LNG・メタノール・アンモニア・水素の海運燃料経路の実現可能性に与える影響を60隻の模擬船隊で定量評価。バイオ燃料がドロップイン互換性と経路非依存性により全シナリオで最高のレジリエンスを示し、効率改善ベースラインがB30混合要件を26%削減。LNG・メタノールはフジャイラ依存で脆弱、アンモニア・水素はインフラ集中リスクで遅延する。

English

This study quantifies how geopolitical corridor disruptions (Red Sea rerouting, Strait of Hormuz restriction) reshape the feasibility and economics of maritime fuel pathways—biofuels, LNG, methanol, ammonia, hydrogen—across a simulated 60-vessel Middle East fleet under FuelEU Maritime and IMO Net-Zero compliance. Biofuels rank highest in resilience due to drop-in compatibility and route independence; efficiency-adjusted baselines cut B30 blending requirements by 26%. Corridor-dependent LNG and methanol collapse under Hormuz restriction, while ammonia and hydrogen timelines extend further.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本海運大手(商船三井・日本郵船・川崎汽船)は中東航路とLNG・メタノール燃料導入を進めており、地政学リスクを織り込んだ燃料経路選定は日本企業の投資判断に直結する。IMO Net-Zero FrameworkやFuelEU対応を睨む日本船主の移行戦略に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

As IMO Net-Zero Framework and FuelEU Maritime compliance tighten, this paper shows that fuel-pathway rankings must be stress-tested against geopolitical corridor risk—a dimension largely absent from TCFD/ISSB transition planning. It offers a resilience-scoring method relevant to global shipping decarbonization and transition-finance risk assessment.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:地政学シナリオを燃料経路評価に統合するレジリエンス・スコア手法は、海運脱炭素研究の新たな分析枠組みとして参考になる。

🏢実務担当者:中東航路に依存する船隊の燃料投資判断において、バイオ燃料の低CAPEX・経路非依存性と効率改善の組み合わせを優先する根拠を提供する。

🏛政策担当者:IMO・EU規制下での燃料混合義務やインフラ集中リスクを踏まえ、 bunkeringハブの分散化や燃料柔軟性を促す政策設計の必要性を示唆する。

📄 Abstract(原文)

This paper evaluates the resilience of sustainable maritime fuel pathways, including biofuels, LNG, methanol, ammonia, and hydrogen, under geopolitical corridor disruptions affecting Middle East fleet operations. Building on previously developed efficiency-first and fuel-evaluation frameworks, the study quantifies how Red Sea rerouting, Strait of Hormuz restriction, and bunkering-infrastructure concentration risk alter fuel-pathway feasibility, lifecycle compliance exposure under FuelEU Maritime and the IMO Net-Zero Framework, biofuel volume requirements, and transition economics across a simulated sixty-vessel fleet. A geopolitical scenario overlay is applied to an interaction-adjusted efficiency baseline and phased fuel-pathway model previously validated for bulk carrier, tanker, and gas carrier segments. Three scenarios are constructed: (A) sustained Red Sea rerouting via the Cape of Good Hope, extending Middle East-EU corridor distances by approximately 3,500 nautical miles; (B) Strait of Hormuz partial restriction, disrupting Fujairah-dependent bunkering access; and (C) compound disruption combining both with war-risk premium escalation. Each scenario re-computes well-to-wake intensity exposure, biofuel blending volumes, corridor-fuel bunkering feasibility, CII trajectory degradation, and retrofit net present value. A composite resilience score is introduced to rank fuel pathways by route independence, infrastructure diversification, fuel flexibility, and capital robustness under disruption. Biofuels demonstrate the highest pathway resilience across all disruption scenarios due to their drop-in compatibility, minimal infrastructure requirements, and route-independent deployment. Under Red Sea rerouting, fleet fuel demand increases by 25 to 35 percent on affected corridors, expanding lifecycle compliance deficits under well-to-wake regimes. Efficiency-adjusted baselines absorb a significant share of this increase, reducing the biofuel blending volumes required to close intensity gaps. For a high-exposure containership and RoPax subset, post-efficiency biofuel requirements at B30 blending remain 26 percent lower than pre-efficiency baselines even under disrupted routing. Corridor-dependent LNG and methanol strategies exhibit high vulnerability under Strait of Hormuz restriction, as Fujairah, the region's primary bunkering hub, becomes inaccessible, collapsing supply reliability for fuels requiring specialized infrastructure. Ammonia and hydrogen readiness timelines extend further under disruption due to compounded infrastructure concentration risk. Onboard carbon capture retains value as a constraint-relief option where sustainable fuel access is geographically limited. War-risk premiums at 0.7 to 1.0 percent of hull value compress capital budgets, favoring low-CAPEX biofuel adoption over high-capital fuel-switching retrofits. The resilience-scoring methodology ranks biofuel-led strategies highest, followed by efficiency-plus-onboard-carbon-capture combinations, with single-corridor fuel commitments ranking lowest across compound disruption scenarios. Sustainable maritime fuel evaluations typically assume stable bunkering access and predictable trade corridors. This paper is among the first to quantify how geopolitical corridor disruption reshapes fuel-pathway ranking and biofuel volume economics under upcoming compliance regimes. The resilience-scoring methodology provides practicing engineers with an actionable tool to evaluate sustainable fuel investments against route uncertainty and infrastructure concentration risk that now define Middle East maritime operations.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。