← 論文一覧に戻る

Integrating Strategic Management Accounting And Sustainability Accounting Under the Twin Transition: A Conceptual Framework For Vietnamese Enterprises Toward Net-Zero Emissions

ツイン・トランジション下における戦略的管理会計とサステナビリティ会計の統合:ベトナム企業のネットゼロ排出に向けた概念的枠組み (AI 翻訳)

Tran Huyen Thu

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-12#炭素会計経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.56201/ijefm.v11.no7.2026.pg103.115
原典: https://doi.org/10.56201/ijefm.v11.no7.2026.pg103.115

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、戦略的管理会計とサステナビリティ会計の統合枠組みを提案し、デジタル技術が持続可能性情報を戦略的意思決定に活用可能にするメカニズムを理論的に示す。ベトナム企業のネットゼロ目標とCBAM対応を念頭に、3つの研究命題を提示する。実証検証は今後の課題である。

English

This paper proposes a conceptual framework integrating strategic management accounting and sustainability accounting, positioning digital technologies as the mechanism to make sustainability information strategically actionable. It offers three research propositions calibrated to Vietnamese enterprises facing net-zero and CBAM pressures. The framework awaits empirical validation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

ベトナム企業向けの枠組みだが、日本企業にも示唆がある。SSBJ開示やカーボンプライシング対応において、管理会計とサステナビリティ会計の統合は重要であり、デジタル技術の活用は日本でも進むべき方向性。

In the global GX context

This framework addresses a global gap in integrating management and sustainability accounting, relevant to ISSB and CSRD contexts. It highlights the role of digital enablement in making sustainability data actionable for strategy, offering a structured logic for firms in emerging economies facing CBAM.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical bridge between two accounting streams and propositions for empirical testing.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a structured logic for embedding decarbonization into strategic decision-making, useful for sustainability and finance teams.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests how policy can encourage integrated accounting practices to support net-zero transitions.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The global pursuit of net-zero emissions has repositioned decarbonisation from a peripheral compliance concern to a determinant of competitive survival, yet the accounting systems firms rely upon to guide strategic decisions were not designed to internalise carbon and other sustainability imperatives. This deficiency is acute in export-dependent, carbon-intensive emerging economies such as Vietnam, which has pledged net-zero emissions by 2050 while facing immediate pressure from the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. This paper addresses a persistent theoretical gap: strategic management accounting and sustainability accounting have developed as largely separate scholarly conversations, leaving unexamined the mechanisms by which the two systems might complement one another under the conditions of the contemporary twin transition. Adopting a desk-research methodology grounded in the synthesis, analysis, comparison, and evaluation of academic, standard-setting, and policy literature, the study develops an integrated conceptual framework built on three interdependent pillars-strategic, sustainability, and digital enablement-drawing on stakeholder theory, institutional theory, the resource-based view, and contingency theory. The framework positions the digital technologies of the twin transition as the mechanism that renders sustainability information strategically actionable and strategic decisions environmentally informed, and it yields three research propositions calibrated to the Vietnamese context. The paper contributes theoretically by bridging two disconnected research streams, and practically by offering managers and policymakers a structured logic for embedding decarbonisation within strategic decision-making. Its principal limitation is that the framework is a theoretical proposition awaiting empirical validation, a task the study specifies as a clear agenda for future research.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。