gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

On the Importance and Challenges of the Principle of "Common but Differentiated Responsibilities" in Global Climate Governance

地球規模の気候ガバナンスにおける「共通だが差異ある責任」原則の重要性と課題について (AI 翻訳)

Yangyiping Han

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Mediaプレプリント2026-02-02#政策Origin: CN
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/2026.zju31533
原典: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2026.zju31533

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、国連気候変動枠組条約(UNFCCC)で確立された「共通だが差異ある責任(CBDR)」原則の重要性と課題を分析。歴史的排出量や発展段階の違いに基づく同原則が、近年、先進国による責任回避の試みで挑戦を受けている。中国はカーボンピーク・カーボンニュートラル目標を掲げ、原則を支持。気候ガバナンスの公平性と持続可能性にとってCBDRの維持が不可欠と結論。

English

This paper analyzes the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR) principle in global climate governance, highlighting its historical evolution and current challenges from developed countries evading responsibility. China's response includes carbon peak/neutrality goals. It argues that upholding CBDR is crucial for fairness and sustainable development, requiring enhanced international cooperation and finance.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本は先進国としてCBDR原則の下で一定の排出削減責任を負う一方、中国などの新興国との差異が議題となる。本論文は、気候交渉における日本の立場や戦略を検討する上で参考になる。

In the global GX context

The CBDR principle is foundational to global climate governance, and this paper provides a clear analysis of its challenges, especially from developed countries. It offers insights for international negotiations, particularly regarding the roles of China and other developing nations.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive review of the CBDR principle's evolution and current debates, useful for scholars of international climate law and policy.

🏛政策担当者:Essential reading for climate negotiators and policy advisors to understand the ongoing tensions around differentiated responsibilities and the implications for future commitments.

📄 Abstract(原文)

This paper explores the pivotal role of the "Common but Differentiated Responsibilities" principle in global climate governance, examining its historical evolution, scientific basis, practical dilemmas, and China's response strategies. Since its formal establishment in the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), this principle has served as the cornerstone of global climate governance . It acknowledges the shared responsibility of all nations in addressing climate change while fully recognizing the differences between developed and developing countries in historical emissions, development stages, and capabilities . However, in recent years, this principle has confronted numerous challenges. Some developed countries have attempted to obscure or distort it to evade responsibility, such as failing to deliver on mitigation actions and unfulfilled climate finance commitments. China has consistently upheld and implemented this principle, actively fulfilling its emission reduction obligations. It has proposed the "carbon peak and carbon neutrality" goals, promoted energy transition and green development, and contributed Chinese wisdom to advancing global climate governance. This paper analyzes the principle's essence, scientific basis, and international practices, emphasizing its importance for fairness and sustainable development, while outlining future pathways to strengthen it. Research indicates that upholding the CBDR principle is crucial for addressing climate change, requiring enhanced international cooperation, financial mechanisms, and capacity building.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。