A comprehensive review of risks and mitigation strategies for safe hydrogen infrastructure deployment
安全な水素インフラ展開のためのリスクと緩和戦略に関する包括的レビュー (AI 翻訳)
R. A. Mensah, Andrea Correa, Solomon Asante-Okyere, Cecilia Wallmark, Michael Försth
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、水素バリューチェーン全体の安全性リスク（漏洩、過圧、材料劣化など）と既存の緩和技術（漏洩検知、緊急換気等）を体系的に調査し、予測モデリングやAI安全システムなどの研究ギャップを特定。水素安全基準の調和と政策立案への示唆を提供する。
English
This review systematically examines safety risks across the hydrogen value chain (leaks, over-pressurization, material degradation) and evaluates mitigation technologies such as leak detection and emergency ventilation. It identifies key research gaps in predictive modeling, AI-enabled safety systems, and harmonized standards, providing guidance for safer hydrogen infrastructure deployment.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は水素基本戦略で水素社会を掲げており、安全なインフラ整備が急務。本レビューはSSBJや国内規制の策定にも資する包括的な知見を提供する。
In the global GX context
As hydrogen scales globally for decarbonization, safety is a critical enabler. This review synthesizes risks and mitigation measures relevant to international standards (ISO, IEC) and supports regulatory frameworks like the EU Hydrogen Strategy or US Hydrogen Hub requirements.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Identifies underexplored areas such as AI-based safety systems and hydrogen combustion modeling for future research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a structured overview of mitigation technologies and risk hotspots to guide infrastructure design and operation.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for harmonized safety standards and targeted funding for predictive modeling and digital twins.
📄 Abstract（原文）
As hydrogen gains momentum as a clean and versatile energy carrier for decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors, ensuring the safety of hydrogen infrastructure becomes critical for its widespread adoption. This review draws on peer-reviewed literature, industrial reports, and international standards for hydrogen technologies. It systematically examines safety risks across the hydrogen value chain, from production to end-of-life and assesses the effectiveness of existing mitigation strategies as well as identifying key research gaps. Common risks such as hydrogen leaks, over-pressurization, and material degradation are present at nearly every stage. Less frequent but potentially severe hazards include the risk of ice formation or equipment damage from cryogenic hydrogen leaks, and toxic exposures from chemical carriers like ammonia or hydrides used for hydrogen storage and transport. The mitigation technologies evaluated include leak detection systems, quick-release valves, emergency ventilation, and both material-based and physical barrier systems. While these safety solutions provide considerable protective potential, their long-term effectiveness depends on real-time responsiveness, and regulatory enforcement. The review also highlights critical gaps in predictive modeling, material durability under extreme conditions exacerbated by climate change, and human error analysis. Emerging technologies, such as AI-enabled safety systems and digital twins, remain underexplored, and current hydrogen safety frameworks have a limited understanding of hydrogen combustion behavior and effective fire suppression strategies. To support the safe and scalable deployment of hydrogen infrastructure, the study calls for targeted research, stakeholder education, and harmonized safety standards. This review provides a timely synthesis of risks and controls to guide future development, policy, and innovation in hydrogen safety. This review will support industry stakeholders, and researchers in developing safer, more reliable, and standardized hydrogen infrastructure.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2026.1721648first seen 2026-06-10 05:33:49
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。