土壌二酸化炭素除去に関する専門家の意見
Expert opinions on soil carbon dioxide removal (原題)
Lauren Gifford, Sara Nawaz, Margaret Morgan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
土壌炭素除去（土壌CDR）の科学的基盤、市場メカニズム、政策の役割について、専門家への調査とインタビューを実施。専門家は土壌の炭素除去への貢献は限定的としつつ、MMRVの実現可能性に懐疑的。市場への期待は低く、土壌健康などの共便益を重視。
English
This study surveys and interviews experts on soil carbon dioxide removal (CDR), examining scientific foundations, market viability, and policy roles. Experts agree soils can contribute modestly but are skeptical of MMRV reliability. Market optimism is low, with emphasis on co-benefits like soil health and ecosystem services.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではJ-クレジット制度における土壌炭素貯留の方法論が検討されており、本論文のMMRVへの懐疑的見解は制度設計に示唆を与える。また、農地土壌の炭素貯留は国内のGX推進における重要なテーマであり、専門家の意見は政策形成に参考となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, soil CDR is a growing focus for carbon markets and climate policy. This paper's critical examination of MMRV reliability and market effectiveness informs ongoing debates on carbon credit integrity and the role of co-benefits, relevant to ISSB and voluntary carbon market frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical insights into expert perceptions of soil CDR, highlighting gaps between scientific knowledge and market assumptions.
🏢実務担当者:Useful for companies considering soil carbon credits, highlighting the need for robust MMRV and the value of co-benefits.
🏛政策担当者:Informs policy design for soil CDR, emphasizing the importance of governance and realistic expectations for market mechanisms.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Soil carbon dioxide removal (soil CDR) has gained increasing attention as both a climate mitigation strategy and a target for carbon market development, yet questions remain about the scientific basis for soil CDR, the viability of market mechanisms, and the role of policy in supporting or constraining implementation. Drawing on concepts of co-production, where scientific knowledge and social order are produced together, we investigate how expertise shapes and is shaped by emerging market structures. Our study draws from an online survey and interviews with soil scientists, consultants, market actors, and other experts actively engaged in soil CDR. We examine expert views on the status of scientific knowledge, the role of different policy approaches, inclusiveness of decisionmaking, and other themes. We find that experts broadly agree that soils can contribute modestly to carbon removal, but expressed skepticism about the feasibility and reliability of monitoring, measurement, reporting, and verification (MMRV) systems. While markets dominated the framing of conversations, few respondents expressed optimism about their effectiveness, noting instead the value of co-benefits of soil CDR development like soil health and ecosystem services. These findings underscore the need to critically interrogate assumptions about markets, attend to power and governance in knowledge production, and situate soil CDR within broader social and policy contexts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-026-04262-wfirst seen 2026-08-29 04:44:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。