世界のエネルギー転換に向けた石油・ガスインフラ転用の技術比較評価
Comparative Technology Assessment for Repurposing Oil and Gas Infrastructure for the Global Energy Transition (原題)
O. Kolade, V. A. Adeleke, S. D. Ojo, O. S. Akande, E. A. Torimiro
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、石油・ガスインフラ（枯渇井戸、パイプライン、海洋プラットフォーム、処理施設、貯蔵タンク）を地熱、水素輸送、洋上風力・太陽光、CCS、大規模エネルギー貯蔵に転用する技術を比較レビューする。各経路のエネルギー出力、資本再利用可能性、排出削減、安全性、改修複雑性を評価し、地熱と水素ブレンドの有望性を示す一方、材料劣化や規制不確実性などの課題を指摘する。
English
This paper reviews technologies for repurposing oil and gas infrastructure (depleted wells, pipelines, offshore platforms, processing facilities, storage tanks) for geothermal, hydrogen transport, offshore wind/solar, CCS, and energy storage. It compares energy output, capital reuse, emissions reduction, safety, and retrofit complexity, highlighting geothermal and hydrogen blending potential while noting barriers like material degradation and regulatory uncertainty.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、石油・ガスインフラの転用は、エネルギー転換と地域経済維持の両立に寄与し得る。特に、CCSや水素サプライチェーン構築に向けた既存資産活用は、GX実現に向けた政策と整合する。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper informs transition finance and asset management strategies by providing a comparative framework for repurposing stranded assets, aligning with ISSB/TCFD disclosure on transition risks and opportunities.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparison of repurposing pathways, useful for further techno-economic analysis.
🏢実務担当者:Helps oil and gas companies identify viable reuse options for assets, supporting transition planning and disclosure.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights regulatory barriers and opportunities for enabling infrastructure repurposing in energy transition policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract The global energy transition faces a dual challenge: rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions while managing trillions of dollars of existing oil and gas infrastructure that risks becoming stranded assets. Rather than abandoning this infrastructure, a growing body of research proposes its repurposing for low-carbon energy systems. This paper presents a comparative review of emerging technologies that enable the conversion of legacy oil and gas assets into platforms for clean energy generation, storage, and transport. The study examines five major infrastructure classes; depleted oil and gas wells, pipelines, offshore platforms, processing facilities, and storage tanks and evaluates their potential reuse for geothermal energy production, hydrogen transport, offshore wind and solar integration, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and large-scale energy storage. For each pathway, key engineering, economic, and environmental performance metrics are compared, including achievable energy output, capital reuse potential, emissions reduction, safety considerations, and retrofit complexity. Results from the literature indicate that repurposed geothermal systems in abandoned wells can provide continuous low-carbon baseload power, while existing gas pipelines show strong potential for hydrogen blending and transport with moderate retrofitting. Offshore platforms offer structurally robust foundations for wind and floating solar installations, and depleted reservoirs provide high-capacity, long-duration storage for CO2 and compressed air energy systems. However, technical barriers such as material degradation, corrosion, pressure integrity, and regulatory uncertainty remain significant and vary across repurposing pathways.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.2118/235176-msfirst seen 2026-08-30 04:33:00
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。