Mapping feasible renewable transition space: Land-use, conservation, and grid-access constraints on wind and solar in British Columbia
ブリティッシュコロンビア州における風力と太陽光の土地利用、保全、送電網アクセス制約を考慮した実現可能な再生可能エネルギー移行空間のマッピング (AI 翻訳)
Md. Eliasinul Islam, Pierre McWhannel, Taco Niet
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、再生可能エネルギーの導入可能量を評価するためのオープンソースワークフロー「RESource」を提案する。土地利用規制、環境保護、送電網アクセスを考慮した供給曲線を作成し、ブリティッシュコロンビア州に適用した結果、保全規制が利用可能なポテンシャルに最も大きな影響を与え、風力で44%、太陽光で74%の削減をもたらすことが示された。このツールは透明性の高い立地評価を可能にし、自治体や先住民族、計画立案者にとって有用である。
English
This paper presents RESource, an open-source workflow for assessing feasible renewable energy potential by integrating land-use constraints, environmental safeguards, and grid proximity into wind and solar supply curves. Applied to British Columbia, Canada, it reveals that conservation stringency reduces accessible wind capacity by about 44% and solar by 74%, while other constraints have minor effects. The tool enables transparent and reproducible siting assessments for municipalities, Indigenous nations, and system planners.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、再生可能エネルギーの導入拡大に伴い、土地利用規制や送電網の制約が課題となっている。本手法は、日本の都道府県レベルでの計画策定にも応用可能であり、特に保全地域や系統制約を考慮した現実的な導入ポテンシャルの評価に役立つ。
In the global GX context
Globally, many regions face similar land-use and grid constraints for renewable deployment. This open-source framework provides a reproducible methodology for sub-national energy planning, supporting transparent deliberation over trade-offs in line with energy transition goals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers an open-source spatial modeling approach for renewable energy feasibility that can be adapted to other regions or integrated with energy system models.
🏢実務担当者:Useful for renewable energy developers and utility planners to identify viable project sites and assess constraints transparently.
🏛政策担当者:Provides a tool for evidence-based land-use and energy policy, enabling assessment of trade-offs between conservation and renewable deployment.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Rapid wind and solar deployment are central to decarbonization, yet feasible deployment is shaped by energy geography: the spatial distribution of resource quality, land use, and -grid-network accessibility. Sub-national plans often rely on siting assumptions that are opaque and difficult to audit, limiting comparability and legitimate deliberation over trade-offs. We present RESource, an open-source workflow that makes siting constraints explicit and reproducible by translating land-use rules, environmental safeguards, and grid proximity into optimization-ready wind and solar supply curves. The framework integrates transparent spatial exclusions, configurable buffers, distance-based connection-cost proxies, and technology-specific hourly capacity-factor profiles under stable geospatial identifiers. Applied to British Columbia, Canada, we find that under the stated scenario assumptions conservation stringency is the dominant constraint on accessible potential. A strict-conservation policy scenario reduces accessible wind capacity by about 44% and solar by about 74% relative to baseline, whereas removing all setback buffers or imposing a 50 km grid-proximity limit changes accessible capacity by 6% or less. The results reveal pronounced spatial heterogeneity in screened costs and feasibility, with viable transition corridors concentrating in interior and northern regions where resource quality, developable land and grid access align. By making exclusions, buffers, and grid costs explicit and auditable, RESource lowers barriers for municipalities, Indigenous nations, and system planners to produce transparent siting assessments. The code and data are openly available (GitHub: https://github.com/DeltaE/RESource ; Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16658066 ).
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energ.2026.100077first seen 2026-07-27 04:46:11
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。