Peer Review Report For: Thermal Energy Storage Technologies: A Review of Current Landscape and Future Directions [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 2 not approved]
熱エネルギー貯蔵技術：現状と将来方向のレビュー (AI 翻訳)
Awash Tekle Tafere
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、顕熱・潜熱・熱化学・ハイブリッド型の熱エネルギー貯蔵（TES）技術を体系的に比較し、性能指標（エネルギー密度、効率、熱伝導率）と温度分類（低温・中温・高温）を整理する。ナノ強化相変化材料や可逆熱化学反応による季節貯蔵など最新の進展を紹介しつつ、材料耐久性、経済性、大規模展開の課題を指摘する。低炭素エネルギー転換と産業脱炭素への応用可能性を示す。
English
This review systematically compares thermal energy storage (TES) technologies—sensible, latent, thermochemical, and hybrid—highlighting performance metrics (energy density, efficiency, thermal conductivity) and a unified temperature classification. It covers advances like nano-enhanced phase change materials and reversible thermochemical reactions for seasonal storage, while identifying challenges in material durability, economic feasibility, and large-scale deployment. The paper provides a framework for selecting TES solutions to support low-carbon energy transitions and industrial decarbonization.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では再生可能エネルギーの導入拡大に伴い、需給調整や熱利用の脱炭素化が課題となっており、TES技術は工場や地域熱供給での活用が期待される。本レビューは技術選択の枠組みを提供し、日本の産業界や政策立案者が蓄熱技術の導入を検討する際の基礎資料となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, TES is recognized as a key enabler for integrating variable renewables and decarbonizing industrial heat. This review offers a structured comparison of TES technologies, which is valuable for policymakers and industry stakeholders aligning with net-zero targets and sustainable energy transitions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:蓄熱技術の性能比較と課題を俯瞰するための基礎資料として有用。
🏢実務担当者:工場や地域熱供給での蓄熱システム選定の参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:再生可能エネルギー統合と産業脱炭素政策の技術的裏付けに活用できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Thermal Energy Storage (TES) is a critical technology for enhancing the reliability, flexibility, and efficiency of renewable energy systems. This review paper provides an inclusive study of TES mechanisms like sensible heat storage (SHS), latent heat storage (LHS), thermochemical energy storage (TCES), and hybrid systems, and emphasizing their operating principle, material property, and application context. Key performance indicators are systematically assessed: SHS (50–150 kJ/kg, 70–90% efficiency), LHS (150–250 kJ/kg, 75–95% efficiency), and TCES (250–1200 kJ/kg, 75–90% efficiency), alongside thermal conductivity ranges (0.2–10 W/m.K) and environmental impacts. A unified temperature classification is applied across technologies: low (<200 °C), medium (200–600 °C), and high (>600 °C), ensuring consistency in comparative analysis. This paper shows thermal energy storage options by incorporating nano-enhanced phase change materials, reversible thermochemical reactions for seasonal storage, and innovative system designs that improve operational responsiveness and grid integration. Despite substantial advancements in thermal energy storage technologies, several critical challenges continue to hinder their widespread adoption and long-term reliability. Issues of material durability, economic feasibility, and large-scale deployment remain unresolved, especially for high-temperature and long-duration storage applications. Addressing these limitations is essential to unlock the full potential of TES in supporting sustainable energy systems. This paper reviews that to emphasize individual storage mechanisms, synthesizes technological progress, deployment insights, and regional relevance to establish a framework for selecting and advancing TES solutions that support low-carbon energy transitions, industrial decarbonization, and climate-resilient infrastructure.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.200560.r493374first seen 2026-08-08 04:51:51
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。