gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Community Co-creation of Nature-Based Solutions: a transdisciplinary framework for participatory process monitoring, evaluating and learning applied to the Connecting the Culm project

自然を基盤とした解決策のコミュニティ共創:参加型プロセスのモニタリング、評価、学習のためのトランスディシプリナリー枠組み (AI 翻訳)

Sarah Ward

Urban Transformations📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-21#その他Origin: Global
DOI: 10.1186/s42854-026-00098-w
原典: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-026-00098-w
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、自然を基盤とした解決策(NBS)の共創プロセスを評価するための簡便なトランスディシプリナリー枠組みを提案する。価値、影響力、参加の指標を用いて「共創コンステレーション」として可視化し、英国南西部のConnecting the Culmプロジェクトに適用した。結果、一部の活動や成果物が他のものより効果的であることが示され、設計段階での枠組み活用がプロジェクトの成果向上に寄与する可能性が示唆された。

English

This paper presents a simple transdisciplinary framework for monitoring, evaluating, and learning (MEL) from nature-based solution (NBS) co-creation processes. Using indicators of value, influence, and participation, results are visualized as a 'co-creation constellation'. Applied to the Connecting the Culm project in the UK, it shows some activities/artifacts are more effective, and using the framework at the design stage could enhance outcomes.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではグリーンインフラや気候変動適応策としてNBSへの関心が高まっているが、共創プロセスの評価枠組みは未整備。本枠組みは地域コミュニティとの協働を評価する実践的ツールとして、日本の自治体やNPOに示唆を与える可能性がある。

In the global GX context

This framework addresses the global need for practical MEL tools in NBS co-creation, which is crucial for climate adaptation projects worldwide. While applied in the UK, its simple indicator-based approach can be adapted to various contexts, informing international best practices for participatory climate action.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured yet flexible MEL framework for evaluating co-creation processes in NBS, useful for developing comparative studies across projects.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical tool (co-creation constellation) to assess and improve community engagement in NBS projects, helping design more effective participatory activities.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for diverse MEL approaches in NBS projects and the importance of investing in team development to maximize co-creation success.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Nature-based solutions (NBS) are internationally widely recognized as interventions that contribute to climate and environmental adaptation in the face of global change. Uncertainties remain around both their performance and their co-design and co-creation. Focusing on the latter, a range of frameworks for monitoring, evaluating and learning (MEL) from NBS co-creation processes are emerging but there is no ‘one size fits all’ approach. In this paper a simple and practical transdisciplinary MEL framework is presented to reflect on the activities and artefacts generated through NBS co-design and co-creation processes. Indicators focus on value, influence and participation and present the results visually in the form of a ‘co-creation constellation’. The framework is applied through the Connecting the Culm (CtC) project, which was undertaken in the South West of England, UK under the EU Co-Adapt Programme. The resulting CtC co-creation constellation highlights some NBS co-creation activities and artefacts may be more efficacious and effective than others at co-creating value, influence and participation in NBS implementation. Additionally, there was the potential for some activities and artefacts to enhance their value, influence and participation contributions through ongoing work. Furthermore, application of the co-creation constellation at the co-creation activity design stage could enhance the overall outcomes and impact achieved through NBS co-design and co-creation projects. Communities, practitioners and policy-makers may need to consider a combination of NBS MEL approaches, depending on benefits, outcomes and impacts sought, as well as investing in parallel team development processes, to maximise NBS success.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。